GRUFF: LLM Pronoun Fidelity, Reasoning, and Biases in German
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Third-person singular pronouns have long been used to study stereotypical biases in language models and to test their abilities to reason about reference. More recently, the interplay between reasoning and bias has been investigated with the task of pronoun fidelity, which assesses models' abilities to correctly reuse a previously-specified pronoun for a discourse entity, independent of other potentially distracting discourse entities mentioned in between. However, such research focuses on English, which is a language with limited grammatical gender and almost no gender agreement. In this paper we contribute a novel, large-scale dataset, GRUFF, to measure pronoun fidelity in German, covering four different gender agreement systems in nouns, and four sets of pronouns. With this dataset, we show that LLMs show strong grammatical agreement for masculine and feminine entities in the absence of explicit context, but not for neopronouns xier and en. Models are generally not robust to distractors, but encoder-only models are more robust in German than in English, reflecting the importance of grammatical gender. Finally, we show that occupational stereotypes in this context are poorly correlated across grammatical cases, and across most models, except ones with closely related architectures. We release all code and data to encourage further work on gender-inclusive language and referential reasoning in German.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 32 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2026.
Builds on
32 of 59 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 31
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
- 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,254
- 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 659
- 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 564
- 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolutioncited by 442
- 2019Mitigating Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing: Literature Reviewcited by 287
- 2019Evaluating Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 249
- 2018Gender Bias in Neural Natural Language Processingcited by 211
- 2019Counterfactual Data Augmentation for Mitigating Gender Stereotypes in Languages with Rich Morphologycited by 200
- 2018Context-Aware Neural Machine Translation Learns Anaphora Resolutioncited by 97
19 more
- 2021A Survey on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processingcited by 89
- 2020Reducing Gender Bias in Neural Machine Translation as a Domain Adaptation Problemcited by 86
- 2025MultiBLiMP 1.0: A Massively Multilingual Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairscited by 71
- 2021Collecting a Large-Scale Gender Bias Dataset for Coreference Resolution and Machine Translationcited by 62
- 2023"I'm fully who I am": Towards Centering Transgender and Non-Binary Voices to Measure Biases in Open Language Generationcited by 56
- 2022Welcome to the Modern World of Pronouns: Identity-Inclusive Natural Language Processing beyond Gendercited by 47
- 2023MISGENDERED: Limits of Large Language Models in Understanding Pronounscited by 43
- 2021When Does Translation Require Context? A Data-driven, Multilingual Explorationcited by 36
- 2022Language model acceptability judgements are not always robust to contextcited by 22
- 2020The Sensitivity of Language Models and Humans to Winograd Schema Perturbationscited by 21
- 2023What about em? How Commercial Machine Translation Fails to Handle (Neo-)Pronounscited by 19
- 2023Tokenization Matters: Navigating Data-Scarce Tokenization for Gender Inclusive Language Technologiescited by 16
- 2021Extending Challenge Sets to Uncover Gender Bias in Machine Translation: Impact of Stereotypical Verbs and Adjectivescited by 14
- 2022How sensitive are translation systems to extra contexts? Mitigating gender bias in Neural Machine Translation models through relevant contextscited by 10
- 2024WinoPron: Revisiting English Winogender Schemas for Consistency, Coverage, and Grammatical Casecited by 9
- 2025Agree to Disagree? A Meta-Evaluation of LLM Misgenderingcited by 7
- 2025Colombian Waitresses y Jueces canadienses: Gender and Country Biases in Occupation Recommendations from LLMscited by 7
- 2024MisgenderMender: A Community-Informed Approach to Interventions for Misgenderingcited by 6
- 2024The Lou Dataset -- Exploring the Impact of Gender-Fair Language in German Text Classificationcited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025EuroGEST: Investigating gender stereotypes in multilingual language models
- 2025Probing Gender Bias in Multilingual LLMs: A Case Study of Stereotypes in Persian
- 2023Gender bias and stereotypes in Large Language Models
- 2022Do LSTMs See Gender? Probing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Abstract Syntactic Rules
- 2024Mitigating Bias in Queer Representation within Large Language Models: A Collaborative Agent Approach
- 2025Dissecting Bias in LLMs: A Mechanistic Interpretability Perspective
- 2024Disclosure and Mitigation of Gender Bias in LLMs
- 2023Women Are Beautiful, Men Are Leaders: Gender Stereotypes in Machine Translation and Language Modeling