How sensitive are translation systems to extra contexts? Mitigating gender bias in Neural Machine Translation models through relevant contexts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural Machine Translation systems built on top of Transformer-based architectures are routinely improving the state-of-the-art in translation quality according to word-overlap metrics. However, a growing number of studies also highlight the inherent gender bias that these models incorporate during training, which reflects poorly in their translations. In this work, we investigate whether these models can be instructed to fix their bias during inference using targeted, guided instructions as contexts. By translating relevant contextual sentences during inference along with the input, we observe large improvements in reducing the gender bias in translations, across three popular test suites (WinoMT, BUG, SimpleGen). We further propose a novel metric to assess several large pre-trained models (OPUS-MT, M2M-100) on their sensitivity towards using contexts during translation to correct their biases. Our approach requires no fine-tuning and thus can be used easily in production systems to de-bias translations from stereotypical gender-occupation bias 1. We hope our method, along with our metric, can be used to build better, bias-free translation systems.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2022.
Builds on
25 of 31 references.
References · 25
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,234
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
- 2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languagescited by 723
- 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 659
- 2020Beyond English-Centric Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 561
- 2019Lipstick on a Pig: Debiasing Methods Cover up Systematic Gender Biases in Word Embeddings But do not Remove Themcited by 268
- 2019Evaluating Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 249
- 2019Gender Bias in Contextualized Word Embeddingscited by 203
- 2021Word Alignment by Fine-tuning Embeddings on Parallel Corporacited by 186
- 2018Adversarial Removal of Demographic Attributes from Text Datacited by 170
13 more
- 2020Intrinsic Bias Metrics Do Not Correlate with Application Biascited by 148
- 2018Assessing Gender Bias in Machine Translation -- A Case Study with Google Translatecited by 121
- 2021Debiasing Pre-trained Contextualised Embeddingscited by 107
- 2019Getting Gender Right in Neural Machine Translationcited by 98
- 2019Equalizing Gender Biases in Neural Machine Translation with Word Embeddings Techniquescited by 65
- 2021Collecting a Large-Scale Gender Bias Dataset for Coreference Resolution and Machine Translationcited by 62
- 2021The paradox of the compositionality of natural language: a neural machine translation case studycited by 59
- 2020Neural Machine Translation Doesn't Translate Gender Coreference Right Unless You Make Itcited by 40
- 2021Gender Bias Amplification During Speed-Quality Optimization in Neural Machine Translationcited by 28
- 2019Fair is Better than Sensational:Man is to Doctor as Woman is to Doctorcited by 27
- 2021Evaluating Gender Bias in Natural Language Inferencecited by 27
- 2021Investigating Failures of Automatic Translation in the Case of Unambiguous Gendercited by 20
- 2020The Unreasonable Volatility of Neural Machine Translation Modelscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2023Sociodemographic Bias in Language Models: A Survey and Forward Pathcited by 28
- 2022Debiasing Methods for Fairer Neural Models in Vision and Language Research: A Surveycited by 22
- 2024Robust Pronoun Fidelity with English LLMs: Are they Reasoning, Repeating, or Just Biased?cited by 17
- 2024What the Harm? Quantifying the Tangible Impact of Gender Bias in Machine Translation with a Human-centered Studycited by 15
- 2024Whose wife is it anyway? Assessing bias against same-gender relationships in machine translationcited by 6
- 2023Learning from Red Teaming: Gender Bias Provocation and Mitigation in Large Language Modelscited by 3
- 2023Good, but not always Fair: An Evaluation of Gender Bias for three commercial Machine Translation Systemscited by 2
- 2023Step by Step to Fairness: Attributing Societal Bias in Task-oriented Dialogue Systemscited by 0
- 2024Does Context Help Mitigate Gender Bias in Neural Machine Translation?cited by 0
- 2026GRUFF: LLM Pronoun Fidelity, Reasoning, and Biases in Germancited by 0
- 2026GRUFF: LLM Pronoun Fidelity, Reasoning, and Biases in German28 May 2026
- 2024What the Harm? Quantifying the Tangible Impact of Gender Bias in Machine Translation with a Human-centered Study1 Oct 2024
- 2024Does Context Help Mitigate Gender Bias in Neural Machine Translation?18 Jun 2024
- 2024Robust Pronoun Fidelity with English LLMs: Are they Reasoning, Repeating, or Just Biased?4 Apr 2024
- 2024Whose wife is it anyway? Assessing bias against same-gender relationships in machine translation10 Jan 2024
- 2023Step by Step to Fairness: Attributing Societal Bias in Task-oriented Dialogue Systems11 Nov 2023
- 2023Learning from Red Teaming: Gender Bias Provocation and Mitigation in Large Language Models17 Oct 2023
- 2023Sociodemographic Bias in Language Models: A Survey and Forward Path13 Jun 2023
- 2023Good, but not always Fair: An Evaluation of Gender Bias for three commercial Machine Translation Systems9 Jun 2023
- 2022Debiasing Methods for Fairer Neural Models in Vision and Language Research: A Survey10 Nov 2022