mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Mitigating Bias in Queer Representation within Large Language Models: A Collaborative Agent Approach

arXiv 2411.07656 ↗First posted 12 Nov 2024cs.CL cs.MAcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) often perpetuate biases in pronoun usage, leading to misrepresentation or exclusion of queer individuals. This paper addresses the specific problem of biased pronoun usage in LLM outputs, particularly the inappropriate use of traditionally gendered pronouns ("he," "she") when inclusive language is needed to accurately represent all identities. We introduce a collaborative agent pipeline designed to mitigate these biases by analyzing and optimizing pronoun usage for inclusivity. Our multi-agent framework includes specialized agents for both bias detection and correction. Experimental evaluations using the Tango dataset-a benchmark focused on gender pronoun usage-demonstrate that our approach significantly improves inclusive pronoun classification, achieving a 32.6 percentage point increase over GPT-4o in correctly disagreeing with inappropriate traditionally gendered pronouns (chi2 = 38.57, p < 0.0001). These results accentuate the potential of agent-driven frameworks in enhancing fairness and inclusivity in AI-generated content, demonstrating their efficacy in reducing biases and promoting socially responsible AI.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 10 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2024.

Builds on

10 of 16 references.

References · 10

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  4. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  5. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
  6. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
  7. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 657
  8. 2018Assessing Gender Bias in Machine Translation -- A Case Study with Google Translatecited by 121
  9. 2019Toward Gender-Inclusive Coreference Resolutioncited by 84
  10. 2023"I'm fully who I am": Towards Centering Transgender and Non-Binary Voices to Measure Biases in Open Language Generationcited by 56

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025MALIBU Benchmark: Multi-Agent LLM Implicit Bias Uncovered
  2. 2023Queer People are People First: Deconstructing Sexual Identity Stereotypes in Large Language Models
  3. 2024The Root Shapes the Fruit: On the Persistence of Gender-Exclusive Harms in Aligned Language Models
  4. 2024Towards Implicit Bias Detection and Mitigation in Multi-Agent LLM Interactions
  5. 2023VisoGender: A dataset for benchmarking gender bias in image-text pronoun resolution
  6. 2026Analysis Of Linguistic Stereotypes in Single and Multi-Agent Generative AI Architectures
  7. 2025Assessing Agentic Large Language Models in Multilingual National Bias
  8. 2026GRUFF: LLM Pronoun Fidelity, Reasoning, and Biases in German