mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Plug-in Losses for Evidential Deep Learning: A Simplified Framework for Uncertainty Estimation that Includes the Softmax Classifier

arXiv 2605.22746 ↗First posted 21 May 2026cs.LG eess.AS stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Real-world sensor-based learning systems require uncertainty estimation that is both reliable and computationally efficient. Evidential Deep Learning (EDL) provides single-pass uncertainty estimation by modeling the class probabilities via Dirichlet distributions, where the Dirichlet parameters are predicted by a learned neural network mapping. However, this approach can lead to computational challenges, as Dirichlet expected objectives are more complex than standard supervised learning losses, complicating their analysis and implementation. We address this issue by approximating the objective of the first-order empirical risk minimization problem induced by EDL with a plug-in loss evaluated at the Dirichlet mean and show that, under mild assumptions, the approximation error decays with growing evidence for a broad class of loss functions, including mean-squared error and cross-entropy loss. As a special case, our analysis provides justification for the use of softmax in the context of uncertainty estimation, since under a particular evidence-to-Dirichlet mapping, our framework includes the standard softmax classifier. We validate the proposed simplified objectives on the Google Speech Commands dataset and show that they achieve predictive accuracy and selective prediction performance comparable to classical EDL, while being simpler to implement using standard deep learning losses and training pipelines. To the best of our knowledge, this empirical analysis is the first to obtain coverage-accuracy trade-offs for speech recognition tasks through EDL.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2026.

Builds on

19 of 32 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  2. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  3. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
  4. 2018Speech Commands: A Dataset for Limited-Vocabulary Speech Recognitioncited by 741
  5. 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 728
  6. 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 555
  7. 2020Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of Generalizationcited by 480
  8. 2019Deep Evidential Regressioncited by 354
  9. 2019NeMo: a toolkit for building AI applications using Neural Modulescited by 230
  10. 2021Prior and Posterior Networks: A Survey on Evidential Deep Learning Methods For Uncertainty Estimationcited by 71
  11. 2022Pitfalls of Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification through Loss Minimisationcited by 65
  12. 2023Uncertainty Estimation by Fisher Information-based Evidential Deep Learningcited by 58
7 more
  1. 2020MatchboxNet: 1D Time-Channel Separable Convolutional Neural Network Architecture for Speech Commands Recognitioncited by 36
  2. 2024Is Epistemic Uncertainty Faithfully Represented by Evidential Deep Learning Methods?cited by 34
  3. 2020Regression Prior Networkscited by 28
  4. 2024A Comprehensive Survey on Evidential Deep Learning and Its Applicationscited by 25
  5. 2024Are Uncertainty Quantification Capabilities of Evidential Deep Learning a Mirage?cited by 17
  6. 2024Revisiting Essential and Nonessential Settings of Evidential Deep Learningcited by 15
  7. 2022Revisiting Softmax for Uncertainty Approximation in Text Classificationcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.