mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Clipping Bottleneck: Stabilizing RLVR via Stochastic Recovery of Near-Boundary Signals

arXiv 2605.22703 ↗First posted 21 May 2026cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a central paradigm for scaling LLM reasoning, yet its optimization often suffers from training instability and suboptimal convergence. Through a systematic dissection of clipping-based GRPO-style objectives, we identify the rigid clipping decision induced by hard clipping as a key practical bottleneck in the studied RLVR setups. Specifically, our analysis suggests that informative signals can lie in the near-boundary region just beyond the clipping threshold, and are therefore discarded by the standard hard-clipping rule. Notably, once this bottleneck is precisely identified, even simple stochastic perturbations at the boundary can recover meaningful performance gains. Building on this finding, we propose Near-boundary Stochastic Rescue (NSR), a minimal, plug-and-play modification that stochastically retains these slightly out-of-bound tokens to recover lost signals. While NSR, via stochastic sampling, can be interpreted as inducing an implicit gradient decay in expectation, our ablations reveal that its stochastic, boundary-local rescue mechanism is consistently more effective than deterministic gradient decay. Validated by extensive experiments across model sizes from 7B to 30B and both dense and MoE architectures, as a plug-and-play solution, NSR substantially improves training stability and delivers consistent gains over strong baselines such as DAPO and GSPO.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 32 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2026.

Builds on

32 of 36 references.

Closest ancestors · 21

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Sparse but Critical: A Token-Level Analysis of Distributional Shifts in RLVR Fine-Tuning of LLMs23 Mar
  2. 2026On the Direction of RLVR Updates for LLM Reasoning: Identification and Exploitation23 Mar
  3. 2026FIPO: Eliciting Deep Reasoning with Future-KL Influenced Policy Optimization20 Mar
  4. 2025Soft Adaptive Policy Optimization25 Nov
  5. 2025Rethinking Entropy Interventions in RLVR: An Entropy Change Perspective11 Oct
  6. 2025Low-probability Tokens Sustain Exploration in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward3 Oct
  7. 2025It's Not You, It's Clipping: A Soft Trust-Region via Probability Smoothing for LLM RL25 Sep
  8. 2025Single-stream Policy Optimization16 Sep
  9. 2025Part I: Tricks or Traps? A Deep Dive into RL for LLM Reasoning11 Aug
  10. 2025Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning2 Jun
  11. 2025The Surprising Effectiveness of Negative Reinforcement in LLM Reasoning2 Jun
  12. 2025The Entropy Mechanism of Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning Language Models28 May
9 more
  1. 2025Do Not Let Low-Probability Tokens Over-Dominate in RL for LLMs19 May
  2. 2025Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training Example29 Apr
  3. 2025VAPO: Efficient and Reliable Reinforcement Learning for Advanced Reasoning Tasks7 Apr
  4. 2025How Difficulty-Aware Staged Reinforcement Learning Enhances LLMs' Reasoning Capabilities: A Preliminary Experimental Study1 Apr
  5. 2025Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base Model31 Mar
  6. 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective26 Mar
  7. 2025SimpleRL-Zoo: Investigating and Taming Zero Reinforcement Learning for Open Base Models in the Wild24 Mar
  8. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale18 Mar
  9. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms20 Jul

Other references · 11

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  3. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
  4. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
  5. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
  6. 2025Group Sequence Policy Optimizationcited by 835
  7. 2025MiniMax-M1: Scaling Test-Time Compute Efficiently with Lightning Attentioncited by 263
  8. 2025A Sober Look at Progress in Language Model Reasoning: Pitfalls and Paths to Reproducibilitycited by 93
  9. 2025Look-Back: Implicit Visual Re-focusing in MLLM Reasoningcited by 55
  10. 2025BAPO: Stabilizing Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning for LLMs via Balanced Policy Optimization with Adaptive Clippingcited by 47
  11. 2025Clip Your Sequences Fairly: Enforcing Length Fairness for Sequence-Level RLcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Flexible Entropy Control in RLVR with a Gradient-Preserving Perspective
  2. 2026From log π to π: Taming Divergence in Soft Clipping via Bilateral Decoupled Decay of Probability Gradient Weight
  3. 2025Clip-Low Increases Entropy and Clip-High Decreases Entropy in Reinforcement Learning of Large Language Models
  4. 2026What are Key Factors for Updates in RL for LLM Reasoning?
  5. 2026How Far Can Unsupervised RLVR Scale LLM Training?
  6. 2025On the optimization dynamics of RLVR: Gradient gap and step size thresholds
  7. 2026Rate or Fate? RLV^varepsilonR: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Noisy Rewards
  8. 2026Beyond Euclidean Clipping: Overcoming Exploration Collapse in LLM RL via Riemannian Isometric Policy Optimization