mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Towards Benchmarking Privacy Vulnerabilities in Selective Forgetting with Large Language Models

arXiv 2512.18035 ↗First posted 19 Dec 2025cs.LG cs.CRcited by 4

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have primarily focused on the process of learning from data to acquire knowledgeable learning systems. As these systems are increasingly deployed in critical areas, ensuring their privacy and alignment with human values is paramount. Recently, selective forgetting (also known as machine unlearning) has shown promise for privacy and data removal tasks, and has emerged as a transformative paradigm shift in the field of AI. It refers to the ability of a model to selectively erase the influence of previously seen data, which is especially important for compliance with modern data protection regulations and for aligning models with human values. Despite its promise, selective forgetting raises significant privacy concerns, especially when the data involved come from sensitive domains. While new unlearning-induced privacy attacks are continuously proposed, each is shown to outperform its predecessors using different experimental settings, which can lead to overly optimistic and potentially unfair assessments that may disproportionately favor one particular attack over the others. In this work, we present the first comprehensive benchmark for evaluating privacy vulnerabilities in selective forgetting. We extensively investigate privacy vulnerabilities of machine unlearning techniques and benchmark privacy leakage across a wide range of victim data, state-of-the-art unlearning privacy attacks, unlearning methods, and model architectures. We systematically evaluate and identify critical factors related to unlearning-induced privacy leakage. With our novel insights, we aim to provide a standardized tool for practitioners seeking to deploy customized unlearning applications with faithful privacy assessments.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 31 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2025.

Builds on

31 of 55 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025CRFU: Compressive Representation Forgetting Against Privacy Leakage on Machine Unlearning27 Feb
  2. 2025Towards LLM Unlearning Resilient to Relearning Attacks: A Sharpness-Aware Minimization Perspective and Beyond7 Feb
  3. 2024Does Unlearning Truly Unlearn? A Black Box Evaluation of LLM Unlearning Methods18 Nov
  4. 2024Catastrophic Failure of LLM Unlearning via Quantization21 Oct
  5. 2024Textual Unlearning Gives a False Sense of Unlearning19 Jun
  6. 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning8 Apr
  7. 2024Learn What You Want to Unlearn: Unlearning Inversion Attacks against Machine Unlearning4 Apr
  8. 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs11 Jan
  9. 2023SalUn: Empowering Machine Unlearning via Gradient-based Weight Saliency in Both Image Classification and Generation19 Oct
  10. 2021Unrolling SGD: Understanding Factors Influencing Machine Unlearning27 Sep
  11. 2021Machine Unlearning of Features and Labels26 Aug

Other references · 20

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,950
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,321
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,979
  4. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,686
  5. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,379
  6. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,319
  7. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,056
  8. 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 872
  9. 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 532
  10. 2023Zephyr: Direct Distillation of LM Alignmentcited by 502
  11. 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 498
  12. 2020Systematic Evaluation of Privacy Risks of Machine Learning Modelscited by 290
8 more
  1. 2020When Machine Unlearning Jeopardizes Privacycited by 198
  2. 2024Tamper-Resistant Safeguards for Open-Weight LLMscited by 136
  3. 2024Evaluating Copyright Takedown Methods for Language Modelscited by 43
  4. 2023PrivLM-Bench: A Multi-level Privacy Evaluation Benchmark for Language Modelscited by 37
  5. 2024Pre-training Differentially Private Models with Limited Public Datacited by 8
  6. 2025SoK: Data Reconstruction Attacks Against Machine Learning Models: Definition, Metrics, and Benchmarkcited by 5
  7. 2023SoK: Comparing Different Membership Inference Attacks with a Comprehensive Benchmarkcited by 3
  8. 2025Quantifying Uncertainty in Natural Language Explanations of Large Language Models for Question Answeringcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Technical Report for the Forgotten-by-Design Project: Targeted Obfuscation for Machine Learning
  2. 2026PrivUn: Unveiling Latent Ripple Effects and Shallow Forgetting in Privacy Unlearning
  3. 2026Shadow Unlearning: A Neuro-Semantic Approach to Fidelity-Preserving Faceless Forgetting in LLMs
  4. 2025Unlearning Imperative: Securing Trustworthy and Responsible LLMs through Engineered Forgetting
  5. 2026UnlearnShield: Shielding Forgotten Privacy against Unlearning Inversion
  6. 2026On the Recoverability of Private Information Unlearning in Large Language Models
  7. 2024A Survey on Machine Unlearning: Techniques and New Emerged Privacy Risks
  8. 2026UnPII: Unlearning Personally Identifiable Information with Quantifiable Exposure Risk