Benchmarking transferability of SSL pretraining to same and different modality segmentation tasks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Methods: Nine SSL methods spanning four pretext-task families were pretrained from scratch using the same 10{,}412 3D CT scans (1.89~M 2D axial slices) covering varied disease sites. The pretrained Swin Transformer encoder from each method was integrated into a SwinUNETR-style segmentation network (Swin encoder with a 3D CNN decoder and skip connections) and fine-tuned on nine public segmentation tasks of varying complexity, including large abdominal organs, head-and-neck structures, and tumors from CT and MRI. Performance was assessed using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Fine-tuning convergence speed, transferability across modalities (CT-to-MRI), and feature-reuse patterns between few- and many-shot fine tuning were further analyzed using centered kernel alignment. Results: Self-distilled masked image transformer (SMIT), which combines masked image modeling (MIM) with local and global self-distillation, achieved the highest overall segmentation accuracy across the nine tasks, the fastest fine-tuning convergence, and the smallest few-shot-to-many-shot performance gap, indicating the strongest data efficiency. SMIT also showed the most consistent feature-reuse patterns between few- and many-shot fine tuning. MIM-based SimMIM and self-distillation methods (DINO, iBOT) outperformed contrastive learning and rotation prediction, which rely on image-level global representations. Differences between SSL methods were largest in the few-shot setting and narrowed as the size of the labeled fine-tuning dataset increased, indicating that the choice of SSL pretraining matters most under limited annotation budgets.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2026.
Builds on
45 of 64 references.
References · 45
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2021BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformerscited by 2,360
- 2018Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotationscited by 1,586
- 2021SimMIM: A Simple Framework for Masked Image Modelingcited by 1,147
- 2022Swin UNETR: Swin Transformers for Semantic Segmentation of Brain Tumors in MRI Imagescited by 823
- 2019The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)cited by 504
- 2021Self-Supervised Pre-Training of Swin Transformers for 3D Medical Image Analysiscited by 418
- 2022AMOS: A Large-Scale Abdominal Multi-Organ Benchmark for Versatile Medical Image Segmentationcited by 347
33 more
- 2020Contrastive learning of global and local features for medical image segmentation with limited annotationscited by 309
- 2020Do Wide and Deep Networks Learn the Same Things? Uncovering How Neural Network Representations Vary with Width and Depthcited by 241
- 2021CoTr: Efficiently Bridging CNN and Transformer for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 227
- 2020How Well Do Self-Supervised Models Transfer?cited by 213
- 2021Self-supervised Pretraining of Visual Features in the Wildcited by 197
- 2015DeepOrgan: Multi-level Deep Convolutional Networks for Automated Pancreas Segmentationcited by 158
- 2023On the Challenges and Perspectives of Foundation Models for Medical Image Analysiscited by 135
- 20203D Self-Supervised Methods for Medical Imagingcited by 134
- 2021MST: Masked Self-Supervised Transformer for Visual Representationcited by 114
- 2023The KiTS21 Challenge: Automatic segmentation of kidneys, renal tumors, and renal cysts in corticomedullary-phase CTcited by 101
- 2023SAM-Med3D: Towards General-purpose Segmentation Models for Volumetric Medical Imagescited by 101
- 2021Self-Supervised Pretraining Improves Self-Supervised Pretrainingcited by 81
- 2022Masked Image Modeling Advances 3D Medical Image Analysiscited by 71
- 2021Transferable Visual Words: Exploiting the Semantics of Anatomical Patterns for Self-supervised Learningcited by 68
- 2022What Makes Transfer Learning Work For Medical Images: Feature Reuse & Other Factorscited by 61
- 2021UniMiSS: Universal Medical Self-Supervised Learning via Breaking Dimensionality Barriercited by 55
- 2021Contrastive Learning with Continuous Proxy Meta-Data for 3D MRI Classificationcited by 49
- 2023Are Natural Domain Foundation Models Useful for Medical Image Classification?cited by 44
- 2023PCRLv2: A Unified Visual Information Preservation Framework for Self-supervised Pre-training in Medical Image Analysiscited by 40
- 2020PGL: Prior-Guided Local Self-supervised Learning for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 36
- 2021COVID-19 Prognosis via Self-Supervised Representation Learning and Multi-Image Predictioncited by 36
- 2020Learning Semantics-enriched Representation via Self-discovery, Self-classification, and Self-restorationcited by 35
- 2021Rethinking Supervised Pre-training for Better Downstream Transferringcited by 35
- 2022Self-supervised 3D anatomy segmentation using self-distilled masked image transformer (SMIT)cited by 35
- 2024Revisiting MAE pre-training for 3D medical image segmentationcited by 33
- 2021How Transferable Are Self-supervised Features in Medical Image Classification Tasks?cited by 32
- 2022Stare at What You See: Masked Image Modeling without Reconstructioncited by 30
- 2020Models Genesiscited by 26
- 2022Self-Supervised Pretraining for 2D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 24
- 2025How Well Do Supervised 3D Models Transfer to Medical Imaging Tasks?cited by 19
- 2024Overcoming Dimensional Collapse in Self-supervised Contrastive Learning for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 7
- 2020Embedding Task Knowledge into 3D Neural Networks via Self-supervised Learningcited by 4
- 2024Swin transformers are robust to distribution and concept drift in endoscopy-based longitudinal rectal cancer assessmentcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.