mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Rethinking Side-Channel Analysis: Automated Discovery and Analysis of Side-Channel Leakage with LLM-Assisted Agents

arXiv 2605.17406 ↗First posted 17 May 2026cs.CRcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Side-channel attacks exploit unintended information leakage from system behavior and continue to pose serious privacy risks in modern platforms. Despite extensive prior work, side-channel analysis remains largely manual and fragmented, typically assuming predefined target events and a fixed set of known channels. As systems and applications grow increasingly complex, several fundamental questions remain unanswered: which user or system events are sensitive in practice, how side channels associated with these events can be systematically discovered without exhaustive manual effort, and how their leakage can be analyzed at scale without prohibitive data collection and model training costs. To address these questions, we present SCAgent, an automated framework for side-channel risk analysis. To identify sensitive targets beyond manually specified events, SCAgent performs agent-driven system exploration guided by LLM-based semantic reasoning. To systematically discover side channels while mitigating the risk of LLM hallucination, it reasons over system documentation and incorporates explicit verification to enforce semantic consistency, threat-model feasibility, and per-channel usability. To enable scalable analysis under limited data, SCAgent adopts a few-shot learning paradigm based on foundation models, avoiding the need to train bespoke models for each channel--event pair. To bridge the gap between raw time-series side-channel signals and tabular foundation models, SCAgent further introduces a time-shift--robust feature extraction layer that enables effective downstream analysis. We instantiate SCAgent on iOS as a first step, focusing on OS-level side channels observable by unprivileged applications. Our evaluation spans standard benchmarks such as foreground app and website fingerprinting, as well as newly identified sensitive in-app activities in popular applications.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 18 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2026.

Builds on

18 of 45 references.

References · 18

  1. 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,601
  2. 2022TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Secondcited by 674
  3. 2024AndroidWorld: A Dynamic Benchmarking Environment for Autonomous Agentscited by 468
  4. 2019InceptionTime: Finding AlexNet for Time Series Classificationcited by 387
  5. 2019ROCKET: Exceptionally fast and accurate time series classification using random convolutional kernelscited by 339
  6. 2020Benchmarking Multivariate Time Series Classification Algorithmscited by 145
  7. 2025Mobile-Agent-E: Self-Evolving Mobile Assistant for Complex Taskscited by 131
  8. 2023PentestGPT: An LLM-empowered Automatic Penetration Testing Toolcited by 97
  9. 2024SPA-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for SmartPhone Agent Evaluationcited by 81
  10. 2024MobileAgentBench: An Efficient and User-Friendly Benchmark for Mobile LLM Agentscited by 63
  11. 2024Mobile-Bench: An Evaluation Benchmark for LLM-based Mobile Agentscited by 56
  12. 2024Oedipus: LLM-enchanced Reasoning CAPTCHA Solvercited by 22
6 more
  1. 2024Large Language Models for Blockchain Security: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 12
  2. 2025AutoEval: A Practical Framework for Autonomous Evaluation of Mobile Agentscited by 9
  3. 2015The Spy in the Sandbox -- Practical Cache Attacks in Javascriptcited by 4
  4. 2015PowerSpy: Location Tracking using Mobile Device Power Analysiscited by 3
  5. 2018Robust Website Fingerprinting Through the Cache Occupancy Channelcited by 2
  6. 2025Leveraging LLMs and attention-mechanism for automatic annotation of historical mapscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Observable Channels, Not Just Storage: Evaluating Privacy Leakage in LLM Agent Pipelines
  2. 2026CIPL: A Channel-Aware Framework for Recoverable Privacy Leakage in LLM Agents
  3. 2026AgentLeak: A Benchmark for Internal-Channel Privacy Leakage in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
  4. 2026ChannelGuard: Safe Models Do Not Compose into Safe Multi-Agent Systems
  5. 2026AgentSecBench: Measuring Prompt Injection, Privacy Leakage, and Tool-Use Integrity in LLM Agents
  6. 2026When Agents Talk, Secrets Travel: Topology-Driven Leakage and Recipient-Conditioned Sanitization in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
  7. 2026PRISM: Generation-Time Detection and Mitigation of Secret Leakage in Multi-Agent LLM Pipelines
  8. 2026Towards a Unified Misuse Monitoring Benchmark