mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

When Agents Talk, Secrets Travel: Topology-Driven Leakage and Recipient-Conditioned Sanitization in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

arXiv 2610.16039 ↗First posted 12 Oct 2026cs.CR cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-agent LLM systems (MALS) introduce a privacy-leakage problem that conventional sensitivity-based defenses miss, since information disclosed to one authorized agent can propagate through routine coordination to an unauthorized one, without compromise or malicious behavior. This motivates topology-aware enforcement that blocks unauthorized propagation while preserving authorized disclosure. We evaluate 485 scenarios across coordinator-worker, peer-to-peer, and hierarchical topologies, instrumenting seven communication channels and measuring surface leakage and disclosure to topology-introduced recipients. We introduce RECONS, a Detect -> Decide -> Transform sanitizer conditioning intervention on recipient and execution context rather than sensitivity alone. Topology changes where protected information propagates, with disclosure to topology-introduced recipients rising from 0% to 52.2% while surface leakage stays nearly flat at 60.6-62.8%. This effect persists across four generator models and a second orchestration framework, though magnitude and relay paths differ; framework choice separately drives a 150x leakage spread, so topology alone is not sufficient. RECONS reduces residual disclosure from 96.7% without sanitization to 29.25%, preserving 94.1% of authorized disclosures versus 20.5% under blanket redaction. Detection coverage is the dominant bottleneck, accounting for 95.5% of residual disclosures. These results show that privacy enforcement in MALS must reason about the recipient and communication path realized at runtime, not sensitivity or topology assumptions alone.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 13 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2026.

Builds on

13 of 31 references.

Closest ancestors · 10

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Multi-Agent Firewall Architecture for Privacy Protection of Sensitive Data in Interactions with Language Models9 Jul
  2. 2026Toward Secure LLM Agents: Threat Surfaces, Attacks, Defenses, and Evaluation9 Jun
  3. 2026AgentGuard: An Attribute-Based Access Control Framework for Tool-Use LLM-Based Agent27 May
  4. 2025Topology Matters: Measuring Memory Leakage in Multi-Agent LLMs4 Dec
  5. 2025MAGPIE: A benchmark for Multi-AGent contextual PrIvacy Evaluation16 Oct
  6. 2025Privacy in Action: Towards Realistic Privacy Mitigation and Evaluation for LLM-Powered Agents22 Sep
  7. 2025The Sum Leaks More Than Its Parts: Compositional Privacy Risks and Mitigations in Multi-Agent Collaboration16 Sep
  8. 2025GAMA: A General Anonymizing Multi-Agent System for Privacy Preservation Enhanced by Domain Rules and Disproof Mechanism12 Sep
  9. 20251-2-3 Check: Enhancing Contextual Privacy in LLM via Multi-Agent Reasoning11 Aug
  10. 2025OpenAgentSafety: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Real-World AI Agent Safety8 Jul

Other references · 3

  1. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,988
  2. 2023Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theorycited by 230
  3. 2023GLiNER: Generalist Model for Named Entity Recognition using Bidirectional Transformercited by 88

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026WebWeaver: Breaking Topology Confidentiality in LLM Multi-Agent Systems with Stealthy Context-Based Inference
  2. 2026AgentLeak: A Benchmark for Internal-Channel Privacy Leakage in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
  3. 2026CIPL: A Channel-Aware Framework for Recoverable Privacy Leakage in LLM Agents
  4. 2024Whispers in the Machine: Confidentiality in Agentic Systems
  5. 2026Observable Channels, Not Just Storage: Evaluating Privacy Leakage in LLM Agent Pipelines
  6. 2026Privacy-Preserving Topology-Guided Safety for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems via Federated Graph Learning
  7. 2026Got a Secret? LLM Agents Can't Keep It: Evaluating Privacy in Multi-Agent Systems
  8. 2025Don't Trust Your Upstream: Exploiting LLM Multi-Agent System via Topology-Guided Adversarial Propagation