mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ANNEAL: Adapting LLM Agents via Governed Symbolic Patch Learning

arXiv 2605.16309 ↗First posted 4 May 2026cs.AI cs.LG cs.MAcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent skill learning and evolution

Abstract (arXiv)

LLM-based agents can recover from individual execution errors, yet they repeatedly fail on the same fault when the underlying process knowledge--operator schemas, preconditions, and constraints--remains unrepaired. Existing self-evolving approaches address this gap by updating prompts, memory, or model weights, but none directly repair the symbolic structures that encode how tasks are executed, and few provide the governance guarantees required for safe deployment. We introduce ANNEAL, a neuro-symbolic agent that converts recurring failures into governed symbolic edits of a process knowledge graph without modifying foundation model weights. Its core mechanism, Failure-Driven Knowledge Acquisition (FDKA), localizes the responsible operator, synthesizes a typed patch through constrained LLM generation, and validates the proposal via multi-dimensional scoring, symbolic guardrails, and canary testing before commit. Every accepted edit carries full provenance and deterministic rollback capability. Across four domains and 27 multi-seed runs, ANNEAL is the only evaluated system that commits persistent structural repairs--strong baselines such as ReAct and Reflexion achieve high episodic recovery yet retain 72--100% holdout failure rates on recurring faults, whereas ANNEAL reduces these to 0% in the tested recurring-failure settings. Ablation confirms that removing FDKA eliminates all structural repairs and drops success rate by up to 26.7 percentage points. These results suggest that governed symbolic repair offers a complementary paradigm to weight-level and prompt-level adaptation for persistent fault elimination.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent skill learning and evolution, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 21 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2026.

Builds on

21 of 33 references.

References · 21

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  2. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
  3. 2023MemoryBank: Enhancing Large Language Models with Long-Term Memorycited by 556
  4. 2025Agentic Context Engineering: Evolving Contexts for Self-Improving Language Modelscited by 398
  5. 2023Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 194
  6. 2025EvolveR: Self-Evolving LLM Agents through an Experience-Driven Lifecyclecited by 137
  7. 2026MemRL: Self-Evolving Agents via Runtime Reinforcement Learning on Episodic Memorycited by 129
  8. 2024WISE: Rethinking the Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing of Large Language Modelscited by 92
  9. 2025SE-Agent: Self-Evolution Trajectory Optimization in Multi-Step Reasoning with LLM-Based Agentscited by 69
  10. 2025SEAgent: Self-Evolving Computer Use Agent with Autonomous Learning from Experiencecited by 69
  11. 2025Your Agent May Misevolve: Emergent Risks in Self-evolving LLM Agentscited by 62
  12. 2025Language Models Are Capable of Metacognitive Monitoring and Control of Their Internal Activationscited by 41
9 more
  1. 2025EvoTest: Evolutionary Test-Time Learning for Self-Improving Agentic Systemscited by 37
  2. 2024Towards Cognitive AI Systems: a Survey and Prospective on Neuro-Symbolic AIcited by 24
  3. 2024Should We Really Edit Language Models? On the Evaluation of Edited Language Modelscited by 18
  4. 2025The Future of Continual Learning in the Era of Foundation Models: Three Key Directionscited by 17
  5. 2026Position: Agentic Evolution is the Path to Evolving LLMscited by 16
  6. 2024Fast and Accurate Task Planning using Neuro-Symbolic Language Models and Multi-level Goal Decompositioncited by 14
  7. 2024OneEdit: A Neural-Symbolic Collaboratively Knowledge Editing Systemcited by 12
  8. 2024Metacognitive AI: Framework and the Case for a Neurosymbolic Approachcited by 9
  9. 2025CLAUSE: Agentic Neuro-Symbolic Knowledge Graph Reasoning via Dynamic Learnable Context Engineeringcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026SkillRevise: Improving LLM-Authored Agent Skills via Trace-Conditioned Skill Revision
  2. 2026Sentry: Learning to Recover from LLM Agent Failures at Test Time
  3. 2026Learning from Failure: Inference-Time Self-Improvement for Computer-Use Agents
  4. 2025ReflexGrad: Within-Episode Failure Recovery in LLM Agents via Progress-Gated Dual-Process Routing
  5. 2026Grow the Harness, Not the Context: From Strategy-Free Scaffolds to Reusable Specialist Agents
  6. 2026When Tools Fail: Benchmarking Dynamic Replanning and Anomaly Recovery in LLM Agents
  7. 2026Evidence-Calibrated Runtime Reconstruction for Agent Skills Across Heterogeneous Coding Agents
  8. 2026Coupling Planning with Episodic Memory in LLM Agents for Software Issue Resolution