mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CLImage: Human-Annotated Datasets for Complementary-Label Learning

arXiv 2305.08295 ↗First posted 15 May 2023cs.LG cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Complementary-label learning (CLL) is a weakly-supervised learning paradigm that aims to train a multi-class classifier using only complementary labels, which indicate classes to which an instance does not belong. Despite numerous algorithmic proposals for CLL, their practical applicability remains unverified for two reasons. Firstly, these algorithms often rely on assumptions about the generation of complementary labels, and it is not clear how far the assumptions are from reality. Secondly, their evaluation has been limited to synthetically labeled datasets. To gain insights into the real-world performance of CLL algorithms, we developed a protocol to collect complementary labels from human annotators. Our efforts resulted in the creation of four datasets: CLCIFAR10, CLCIFAR20, CLMicroImageNet10, and CLMicroImageNet20, derived from well-known classification datasets CIFAR10, CIFAR100, and TinyImageNet200. These datasets represent the very first real-world CLL datasets, namely CLImage, which are publicly available at: https://github.com/ntucllab/CLImageDataset. Through extensive benchmark experiments, we discovered a notable decrease in performance when transitioning from synthetically labeled datasets to real-world datasets. We investigated the key factors contributing to the decrease with a thorough dataset-level ablation study. Our analyses highlight annotation noise as the most influential factor in the real-world datasets. In addition, we discover that the biased-nature of human-annotated complementary labels and the difficulty to validate with only complementary labels are two outstanding barriers to practical CLL. These findings suggest that the community focus more research efforts on developing CLL algorithms and validation schemes that are robust to noisy and biased complementary-label distributions.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2023.

Builds on

15 of 34 references.

References · 15

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  4. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  5. 2019Big Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learningcited by 766
  6. 2018AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Datacited by 728
  7. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  8. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
  9. 2017Learning with Biased Complementary Labelscited by 93
  10. 2017Learning from Complementary Labelscited by 88
  11. 2018Complementary-Label Learning for Arbitrary Losses and Modelscited by 57
  12. 2019Learning with Multiple Complementary Labelscited by 53
3 more
  1. 2020Unbiased Risk Estimators Can Mislead: A Case Study of Learning with Complementary Labelscited by 29
  2. 2019Generative-Discriminative Complementary Learningcited by 12
  3. 2022Reduction from Complementary-Label Learning to Probability Estimatescited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

7 papers.