GRLO: Towards Generalizable Reinforcement Learning in Open-Ended Environments from Zero
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF
Abstract (arXiv)
Post-training has become a crucial step for unlocking the capabilities of large language models, with reinforcement learning (RL) emerging as a critical paradigm. Recent RL-based post-training has increasingly split into two paradigms: reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), which optimizes models using human preference signals in target domains, and reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR), which operates in verifier-backed environments. The latter has dominated recent reasoning-oriented post-training because it delivers stronger gains and higher efficiency on domain-specific tasks (e.g., reasoning). However, although in-domain RL training achieves promising performance, it still requires a substantial amount of GPU compute, which remains a major barrier to broad adoption. In this work, we study the generalization ability of RLHF learned from scratch from a small set of interactions in open-ended environments, and investigate whether the conversational abilities it explicitly acquires can implicitly transfer to downstream tasks such as mathematical reasoning and code generation, namely GRLO. Specifically, on Qwen3-4B-Base backbone, GRLO improves the average performance across all domains from 24.1 to 63.1 with only 5K prompts and 22.7 GPU hours, requiring about 46× less data and 68× less compute than a strong in-domain RLVR baseline. The resulting model is even competitive with Qwen's released post-trained models which required a much larger training cost. Notably, a subsequent in-domain RLVR stage brings only selective gains, mainly on harder competition-math benchmarks. We hope GRLO offers a simple and efficient recipe for building broadly capable post-trained models. Our code and data will be available at: hrefhttps://github.com/SJY8460/GRLOhttps://github.com/SJY8460/GRLO.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 28 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2026.
Builds on
28 of 40 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Skywork-Reward-V2: Scaling Preference Data Curation via Human-AI Synergy2 Jul
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Framework28 Sep
- 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraint18 Dec
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
Other references · 24
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 906
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
- 2025LIMO: Less is More for Reasoningcited by 488
- 2024Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Predictioncited by 465
12 more
- 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedbackcited by 394
- 2023Beyond Human Data: Scaling Self-Training for Problem-Solving with Language Modelscited by 325
- 2025General-Reasoner: Advancing LLM Reasoning Across All Domainscited by 132
- 2025Pass@K Policy Optimization: Solving Harder Reinforcement Learning Problemscited by 83
- 2024Building Math Agents with Multi-Turn Iterative Preference Learningcited by 66
- 2024Bootstrapping Language Models with DPO Implicit Rewardscited by 53
- 2025Stop Summation: Min-Form Credit Assignment Is All Process Reward Model Needs for Reasoningcited by 49
- 2025Long-Short Chain-of-Thought Mixture Supervised Fine-Tuning Eliciting Efficient Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 37
- 2025Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Iterative DPO: A Comprehensive Empirical Investigationcited by 36
- 2024Iterative Length-Regularized Direct Preference Optimization: A Case Study on Improving 7B Language Models to GPT-4 Levelcited by 22
- 2025Better Process Supervision with Bi-directional Rewarding Signalscited by 12
- 2024Flow-DPO: Improving LLM Mathematical Reasoning through Online Multi-Agent Learningcited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026DARL: Encouraging Diverse Answers for General Reasoning without Verifiers
- 2025On the Interplay of Pre-Training, Mid-Training, and RL on Reasoning Language Models
- 2024Reinforcement Learning for LLM Post-Training: A Survey
- 2025A Technical Survey of Reinforcement Learning Techniques for Large Language Models
- 2024RLHF Workflow: From Reward Modeling to Online RLHF
- 2025Breaking Barriers: Do Reinforcement Post Training Gains Transfer To Unseen Domains?
- 2025RL in Name Only? Analyzing the Structural Assumptions in RL post-training for LLMs
- 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback