mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

GRLO: Towards Generalizable Reinforcement Learning in Open-Ended Environments from Zero

arXiv 2605.15464 ↗First posted 14 May 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

Post-training has become a crucial step for unlocking the capabilities of large language models, with reinforcement learning (RL) emerging as a critical paradigm. Recent RL-based post-training has increasingly split into two paradigms: reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), which optimizes models using human preference signals in target domains, and reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR), which operates in verifier-backed environments. The latter has dominated recent reasoning-oriented post-training because it delivers stronger gains and higher efficiency on domain-specific tasks (e.g., reasoning). However, although in-domain RL training achieves promising performance, it still requires a substantial amount of GPU compute, which remains a major barrier to broad adoption. In this work, we study the generalization ability of RLHF learned from scratch from a small set of interactions in open-ended environments, and investigate whether the conversational abilities it explicitly acquires can implicitly transfer to downstream tasks such as mathematical reasoning and code generation, namely GRLO. Specifically, on Qwen3-4B-Base backbone, GRLO improves the average performance across all domains from 24.1 to 63.1 with only 5K prompts and 22.7 GPU hours, requiring about 46× less data and 68× less compute than a strong in-domain RLVR baseline. The resulting model is even competitive with Qwen's released post-trained models which required a much larger training cost. Notably, a subsequent in-domain RLVR stage brings only selective gains, mainly on harder competition-math benchmarks. We hope GRLO offers a simple and efficient recipe for building broadly capable post-trained models. Our code and data will be available at: hrefhttps://github.com/SJY8460/GRLOhttps://github.com/SJY8460/GRLO.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 28 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2026.

Builds on

28 of 40 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Skywork-Reward-V2: Scaling Preference Data Curation via Human-AI Synergy2 Jul
  2. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Framework28 Sep
  3. 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraint18 Dec
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May

Other references · 24

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  4. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  5. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  6. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  7. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  8. 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
  9. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 906
  10. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
  11. 2025LIMO: Less is More for Reasoningcited by 488
  12. 2024Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Predictioncited by 465
12 more
  1. 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedbackcited by 394
  2. 2023Beyond Human Data: Scaling Self-Training for Problem-Solving with Language Modelscited by 325
  3. 2025General-Reasoner: Advancing LLM Reasoning Across All Domainscited by 132
  4. 2025Pass@K Policy Optimization: Solving Harder Reinforcement Learning Problemscited by 83
  5. 2024Building Math Agents with Multi-Turn Iterative Preference Learningcited by 66
  6. 2024Bootstrapping Language Models with DPO Implicit Rewardscited by 53
  7. 2025Stop Summation: Min-Form Credit Assignment Is All Process Reward Model Needs for Reasoningcited by 49
  8. 2025Long-Short Chain-of-Thought Mixture Supervised Fine-Tuning Eliciting Efficient Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 37
  9. 2025Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Iterative DPO: A Comprehensive Empirical Investigationcited by 36
  10. 2024Iterative Length-Regularized Direct Preference Optimization: A Case Study on Improving 7B Language Models to GPT-4 Levelcited by 22
  11. 2025Better Process Supervision with Bi-directional Rewarding Signalscited by 12
  12. 2024Flow-DPO: Improving LLM Mathematical Reasoning through Online Multi-Agent Learningcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026DARL: Encouraging Diverse Answers for General Reasoning without Verifiers
  2. 2025On the Interplay of Pre-Training, Mid-Training, and RL on Reasoning Language Models
  3. 2024Reinforcement Learning for LLM Post-Training: A Survey
  4. 2025A Technical Survey of Reinforcement Learning Techniques for Large Language Models
  5. 2024RLHF Workflow: From Reward Modeling to Online RLHF
  6. 2025Breaking Barriers: Do Reinforcement Post Training Gains Transfer To Unseen Domains?
  7. 2025RL in Name Only? Analyzing the Structural Assumptions in RL post-training for LLMs
  8. 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback