mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Flow-DPO: Improving LLM Mathematical Reasoning through Online Multi-Agent Learning

arXiv 2410.22304 ↗First posted 29 Oct 2024cs.CL cs.LGcited by 11

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

also in 2 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Mathematical reasoning is a crucial capability for Large Language Models (LLMs), yet generating detailed and accurate reasoning traces remains a significant challenge. This paper introduces a novel approach to produce high-quality reasoning traces for LLM fine-tuning using online learning Flows. Our method employs an incremental output production Flow, where component LLMs collaboratively construct solutions through iterative communication. We train the Flow using online Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) learning with rollouts, generating DPO pairs for each training example and updating models in real-time. We directly compare the quality of reasoning traces generated by our method with those produced through direct model inference, demonstrating the effectiveness of our approach in improving LLM performance in mathematical reasoning tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 19 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2024.

Builds on

19 of 21 references.

References · 19

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  2. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  3. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
  4. 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contextscited by 1,582
  5. 2022STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoningcited by 895
  6. 2023MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Modelscited by 724
  7. 2024MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?cited by 573
  8. 2023Scaling Relationship on Learning Mathematical Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 417
  9. 2024ReST-MCTS*: LLM Self-Training via Process Reward Guided Tree Searchcited by 338
  10. 2023Beyond Human Data: Scaling Self-Training for Problem-Solving with Language Modelscited by 325
  11. 2024Quiet-STaR: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Think Before Speakingcited by 292
  12. 2024Omni-MATH: A Universal Olympiad Level Mathematic Benchmark For Large Language Modelscited by 277
7 more
  1. 2024Step-DPO: Step-wise Preference Optimization for Long-chain Reasoning of LLMscited by 265
  2. 2024Iterative Reasoning Preference Optimizationcited by 244
  3. 2024V-STaR: Training Verifiers for Self-Taught Reasonerscited by 214
  4. 2024MathBench: Evaluating the Theory and Application Proficiency of LLMs with a Hierarchical Mathematics Benchmarkcited by 103
  5. 2024LLaMA-Berry: Pairwise Optimization for O1-like Olympiad-Level Mathematical Reasoningcited by 90
  6. 2024Multi-step Problem Solving Through a Verifier: An Empirical Analysis on Model-induced Process Supervisioncited by 51
  7. 2024Online Joint Fine-tuning of Multi-Agent Flowscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 8; 2026: 3.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Mars-PO: Multi-Agent Reasoning System Preference Optimization
  2. 2025OR-LLM-Agent: Automating Modeling and Solving of Operations Research Optimization Problems with Reasoning LLM
  3. 2024Self-Training with Direct Preference Optimization Improves Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
  4. 2025A Practical Two-Stage Recipe for Mathematical LLMs: Maximizing Accuracy with SFT and Efficiency with Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2025Reinforce LLM Reasoning through Multi-Agent Reflection
  6. 2026Critic-Guided Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Reasoning for Reliable Mathematical Problem Solving
  7. 2024Step-Controlled DPO: Leveraging Stepwise Error for Enhanced Mathematical Reasoning
  8. 2026Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models: Benchmarks, Architectures, Evaluation, and Open Challenges