Evaluating Dynamic Conditional Quantile Treatment Effects with Applications in Ridesharing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many modern tech companies, such as Google, Uber, and Didi, utilize online experiments (also known as A/B testing) to evaluate new policies against existing ones. While most studies concentrate on average treatment effects, situations with skewed and heavy-tailed outcome distributions may benefit from alternative criteria, such as quantiles. However, assessing dynamic quantile treatment effects (QTE) remains a challenge, particularly when dealing with data from ride-sourcing platforms that involve sequential decision-making across time and space. In this paper, we establish a formal framework to calculate QTE conditional on characteristics independent of the treatment. Under specific model assumptions, we demonstrate that the dynamic conditional QTE (CQTE) equals the sum of individual CQTEs across time, even though the conditional quantile of cumulative rewards may not necessarily equate to the sum of conditional quantiles of individual rewards. This crucial insight significantly streamlines the estimation and inference processes for our target causal estimand. We then introduce two varying coefficient decision process (VCDP) models and devise an innovative method to test the dynamic CQTE. Moreover, we expand our approach to accommodate data from spatiotemporal dependent experiments and examine both conditional quantile direct and indirect effects. To showcase the practical utility of our method, we apply it to three real-world datasets from a ride-sourcing platform. Theoretical findings and comprehensive simulation studies further substantiate our proposal.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2023.
Builds on
20 of 71 references.
References · 20
- 2018Breaking the Curse of Horizon: Infinite-Horizon Off-Policy Estimationcited by 227
- 2019Efficiently Breaking the Curse of Horizon in Off-Policy Evaluation with Double Reinforcement Learningcited by 75
- 2020Batch Policy Learning in Average Reward Markov Decision Processescited by 69
- 2020Statistical Inference of the Value Function for Reinforcement Learning in Infinite Horizon Settingscited by 65
- 2019Off-Policy Estimation of Long-Term Average Outcomes with Applications to Mobile Healthcited by 42
- 2021Reinforcement Learning for Ridesharing: An Extended Surveycited by 35
- 2020Dynamic Causal Effects Evaluation in A/B Testing with a Reinforcement Learning Frameworkcited by 29
- 2016Bounded, efficient and multiply robust estimation of average treatment effects using instrumental variablescited by 23
- 2019Localized Debiased Machine Learning: Efficient Inference on Quantile Treatment Effects and Beyondcited by 23
- 2017A framework for Multi-A(rmed)/B(andit) testing with online FDR controlcited by 17
- 2022Switchback Experiments under Geometric Mixingcited by 17
- 2021Graph-Based Equilibrium Metrics for Dynamic Supply-Demand Systems with Applications to Ride-sourcing Platformscited by 11
8 more
- 2022Network Interference in Micro-Randomized Trialscited by 7
- 2019On Robustness of Individualized Decision Rulescited by 6
- 2020Cluster-Adaptive Network A/B Testing: From Randomization to Estimationcited by 6
- 2022Quantile Off-Policy Evaluation via Deep Conditional Generative Learningcited by 5
- 2020High-Dimensional Spatial Quantile Function-on-Scalar Regressioncited by 4
- 2022A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Framework for Off-Policy Evaluation in Two-sided Marketscited by 4
- 2020CONQ: CONtinuous Quantile Treatment Effects for Large-Scale Online Controlled Experimentscited by 1
- 2022Dynamic Car Dispatching and Pricing: Revenue and Fairness for Ridesharing Platformscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
7 papers.
- 2024Unraveling the Interplay between Carryover Effects and Reward Autocorrelations in Switchback Experimentscited by 6
- 2024Combining Experimental and Historical Data for Policy Evaluationcited by 6
- 2025Balancing Interference and Correlation in Spatial Experimental Designs: A Causal Graph Cut Approachcited by 5
- 2025A Two-armed Bandit Framework for A/B Testingcited by 2
- 2026Designing Time Series Experiments in A/B Testing with Transformer Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2026Robust Sequential Experimental Design for A/B Testingcited by 0
- 2026A Distribution Mapping Approach to Counterfactually Fair Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026A Distribution Mapping Approach to Counterfactually Fair Reinforcement Learning9 Aug 2026
- 2026Robust Sequential Experimental Design for A/B Testing13 May 2026
- 2026Designing Time Series Experiments in A/B Testing with Transformer Reinforcement Learning2 Feb 2026
- 2025A Two-armed Bandit Framework for A/B Testing24 Jul 2025
- 2025Balancing Interference and Correlation in Spatial Experimental Designs: A Causal Graph Cut Approach26 May 2025
- 2024Combining Experimental and Historical Data for Policy Evaluation1 Jun 2024
- 2024Unraveling the Interplay between Carryover Effects and Reward Autocorrelations in Switchback Experiments26 Mar 2024