mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Multiple Randomization Designs: Estimation and Inference with Interference

arXiv 2112.13495 ↗First posted 27 Dec 2021stat.ME cs.SI econ.EMcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Completely randomized experiments, originally developed by Fisher and Neyman in the 1930s, are still widely used in practice, even in online experimentation. However, such designs are of limited value for answering standard questions in marketplaces, where multiple populations of agents interact strategically, leading to complex patterns of spillover effects. In this paper, we derive the finite-sample properties of tractable estimators for "Simple Multiple Randomization Designs" (SMRDs), a new class of experimental designs which account for complex spillover effects in randomized experiments. Our derivations are obtained under a natural and general form of cross-unit interference, which we call "local interference". We discuss the estimation of main effects, direct effects, and spillovers, and present associated central limit theorems.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Dec 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 5; 2024: 3; 2025: 7; 2026: 3.

20 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022Markovian Interference in Experimentscited by 22
  2. 2023Correcting for Interference in Experiments: A Case Study at Douyincited by 12
  3. 2024Multi-Armed Bandits with Network Interferencecited by 8
  4. 2024Unraveling the Interplay between Carryover Effects and Reward Autocorrelations in Switchback Experimentscited by 6
  5. 2023A Common Misassumption in Online Experiments with Machine Learning Modelscited by 5
  6. 2025Graph-Dependent Regret Bounds in Multi-Armed Bandits with Interferencecited by 5
  7. 2025Balancing Interference and Correlation in Spatial Experimental Designs: A Causal Graph Cut Approachcited by 5
  8. 2025Choosing the Better Bandit Algorithm under Data Sharing: When Do A/B Experiments Work?cited by 4
  9. 2023A Two-Part Machine Learning Approach to Characterizing Network Interference in A/B Testingcited by 3
  10. 2023Tackling Interference Induced by Data Training Loops in A/B Tests: A Weighted Training Approachcited by 3
  11. 2022Network Synthetic Interventions: A Causal Framework for Panel Data Under Network Interferencecited by 2
  12. 2025A Two-armed Bandit Framework for A/B Testingcited by 2
8 more
  1. 2025Differences-in-Neighbors for Network Interference in Experimentscited by 1
  2. 2026The Price of Isolation: Estimating the Ecosystem Cost of Symmetric Two-Sided A/B Testingcited by 1
  3. 2023Causal Estimation of User Learning in Personalized Systemscited by 0
  4. 2024A Simple Model to Estimate Sharing Effects in Social Networkscited by 0
  5. 2025Qini Curve Estimation under Clustered Network Interferencecited by 0
  6. 2025Unbiased Platform-Level Causal Estimation for Search Systems: A Competitive Isolation PSM-DID Frameworkcited by 0
  7. 2026Robust Sequential Experimental Design for A/B Testingcited by 0
  8. 2026Content Exploration Beyond the Feed: Creator Supply and the Shared Corpuscited by 0