Optimal Treatment Allocation for Efficient Policy Evaluation in Sequential Decision Making
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A/B testing is critical for modern technological companies to evaluate the effectiveness of newly developed products against standard baselines. This paper studies optimal designs that aim to maximize the amount of information obtained from online experiments to estimate treatment effects accurately. We propose three optimal allocation strategies in a dynamic setting where treatments are sequentially assigned over time. These strategies are designed to minimize the variance of the treatment effect estimator when data follow a non-Markov decision process or a (time-varying) Markov decision process. We further develop estimation procedures based on existing off-policy evaluation (OPE) methods and conduct extensive experiments in various environments to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methodologies. In theory, we prove the optimality of the proposed treatment allocation design and establish upper bounds for the mean squared errors of the resulting treatment effect estimators.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 6; 2026: 3.
11 papers.
- 2025Doubly Robust Alignment for Large Language Modelscited by 11
- 2024Unraveling the Interplay between Carryover Effects and Reward Autocorrelations in Switchback Experimentscited by 6
- 2024Logarithmic Neyman Regret for Adaptive Estimation of the Average Treatment Effectcited by 3
- 2025Moments of Causal Effectscited by 3
- 2025Optimistic Algorithms for Adaptive Estimation of the Average Treatment Effectcited by 2
- 2025Statistical Inference in Reinforcement Learning: A Selective Surveycited by 2
- 2025A Two-armed Bandit Framework for A/B Testingcited by 2
- 2025Multi-Metric Adaptive Experimental Design Under a Fixed Budget with Validationcited by 1
- 2026Designing Time Series Experiments in A/B Testing with Transformer Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2026Bounds and Identification of Joint Probabilities of Potential Outcomes and Observed Variables under Monotonicity Assumptionscited by 1
- 2026Robust Sequential Experimental Design for A/B Testingcited by 0
- 2026Robust Sequential Experimental Design for A/B Testing13 May 2026
- 2026Bounds and Identification of Joint Probabilities of Potential Outcomes and Observed Variables under Monotonicity Assumptions21 Feb 2026
- 2026Designing Time Series Experiments in A/B Testing with Transformer Reinforcement Learning2 Feb 2026
- 2025A Two-armed Bandit Framework for A/B Testing24 Jul 2025
- 2025Multi-Metric Adaptive Experimental Design Under a Fixed Budget with Validation3 Jun 2025
- 2025Doubly Robust Alignment for Large Language Models1 Jun 2025
- 2025Moments of Causal Effects8 May 2025
- 2025Statistical Inference in Reinforcement Learning: A Selective Survey22 Feb 2025
- 2025Optimistic Algorithms for Adaptive Estimation of the Average Treatment Effect7 Feb 2025
- 2024Logarithmic Neyman Regret for Adaptive Estimation of the Average Treatment Effect21 Nov 2024
- 2024Unraveling the Interplay between Carryover Effects and Reward Autocorrelations in Switchback Experiments26 Mar 2024