mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

State-Centric Decision Process

arXiv 2605.12755 ↗First posted 12 May 2026cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Language environments such as web browsers, code terminals, and interactive simulations emit raw text rather than states, and provide none of the runtime structure that MDP analysis requires. No explicit state space, no observation-to-state mapping, no certified transitions, and no termination criterion. We introduce the State-Centric Decision Process (SDP), a runtime framework that constructs these missing inputs by having the agent build them, predicate by predicate, as it acts. At each step the agent commits to a natural-language predicate describing how the world should look, takes an action to make it true, and checks the observation against it. Predicates that pass become certified states, and the resulting trajectory carries the four objects language environments do not provide, namely a task-induced state space, an observation-to-state mapping, certified transitions, and a termination criterion. We evaluate SDP on five benchmarks spanning planning, scientific exploration, web reasoning, and multi-hop question answering. SDP achieves the best training-free results on all five, with the advantage widening as the horizon grows. The certified trajectories additionally support analyses unavailable to reactive agents, including per-predicate credit assignment, failure localization, partial-progress measurement, and modular operator replacement.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2026.

Builds on

49 of 63 references.

References · 49

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  4. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  5. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
  6. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
  7. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
  8. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
  9. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,211
  10. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
  11. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,242
  12. 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,191
37 more
  1. 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 2,006
  2. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,439
  3. 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,136
  4. 2022Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Modelscited by 1,081
  5. 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Modelscited by 1,075
  6. 2022Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agentscited by 1,035
  7. 2022Interleaving Retrieval with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Knowledge-Intensive Multi-Step Questionscited by 923
  8. 2021MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Compositioncited by 916
  9. 2023ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learnerscited by 876
  10. 2023Reasoning with Language Model is Planning with World Modelcited by 861
  11. 2023Language Agent Tree Search Unifies Reasoning Acting and Planning in Language Modelscited by 574
  12. 2024GPT-4V(ision) is a Generalist Web Agent, if Groundedcited by 563
  13. 2023Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Modelscited by 560
  14. 2023Cognitive Architectures for Language Agentscited by 429
  15. 2023Describe, Explain, Plan and Select: Interactive Planning with Large Language Models Enables Open-World Multi-Task Agentscited by 398
  16. 2024TravelPlanner: A Benchmark for Real-World Planning with Language Agentscited by 392
  17. 2023Is ChatGPT Good at Search? Investigating Large Language Models as Re-Ranking Agentscited by 360
  18. 2022ScienceWorld: Is your Agent Smarter than a 5th Grader?cited by 327
  19. 2024Magentic-One: A Generalist Multi-Agent System for Solving Complex Taskscited by 232
  20. 2023AdaPlanner: Adaptive Planning from Feedback with Language Modelscited by 196
  21. 2025Plan-and-Act: Improving Planning of Agents for Long-Horizon Taskscited by 195
  22. 2023SwiftSage: A Generative Agent with Fast and Slow Thinking for Complex Interactive Taskscited by 168
  23. 2024AssistantBench: Can Web Agents Solve Realistic and Time-Consuming Tasks?cited by 158
  24. 2023RankZephyr: Effective and Robust Zero-Shot Listwise Reranking is a Breeze!cited by 155
  25. 2024EvoAgent: Towards Automatic Multi-Agent Generation via Evolutionary Algorithmscited by 113
  26. 2023CLIN: A Continually Learning Language Agent for Rapid Task Adaptation and Generalizationcited by 95
  27. 2023Reason for Future, Act for Now: A Principled Framework for Autonomous LLM Agents with Provable Sample Efficiencycited by 46
  28. 2024Planning with Multi-Constraints via Collaborative Language Agentscited by 26
  29. 2024Infogent: An Agent-Based Framework for Web Information Aggregationcited by 19
  30. 2025Shifting from Ranking to Set Selection for Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 15
  31. 2025Enhancing LLM-Based Agents via Global Planning and Hierarchical Executioncited by 13
  32. 2025ATLAS: Constraints-Aware Multi-Agent Collaboration for Real-World Travel Planningcited by 13
  33. 2026Beyond Entangled Planning: Task-Decoupled Planning for Long-Horizon Agentscited by 9
  34. 2025PRISM: Agentic Retrieval with LLMs for Multi-Hop Question Answeringcited by 8
  35. 2025MIRROR: Multi-agent Intra- and Inter-Reflection for Optimized Reasoning in Tool Learningcited by 7
  36. 2024Positive Experience Reflection for Agents in Interactive Text Environmentscited by 2
  37. 2025Agent Context Protocols Enhance Collective Inferencecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

  1. 2026World State Generatorcited by 0