mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Revealing Interpretable Failure Modes of VLMs

arXiv 2605.12674 ↗First posted 12 May 2026cs.AI cs.LG cs.ROcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Chain-of-thought reasoning for driving

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly used in safety-critical applications because of their broad reasoning capabilities and ability to generalize with minimal task-specific engineering. Despite these advantages, they can exhibit catastrophic failures in specific real-world situations, constituting failure modes. We introduce REVELIO, a framework for systematically uncovering interpretable failure modes in VLMs. We define a failure mode as a composition of interpretable, domain-relevant concepts-such as pedestrian proximity or adverse weather conditions-under which a target VLM consistently behaves incorrectly. Identifying such failures requires searching over an exponentially large discrete combinatorial space. To address this challenge, REVELIO combines two search procedures: a diversity-aware beam search that efficiently maps the failure landscape, and a Gaussian-process Thompson Sampling strategy that enables broader exploration of complex failure modes. We apply REVELIO to autonomous driving and indoor robotics domains, uncovering previously unreported vulnerabilities in state-of-the-art VLMs. In driving environments, the models often demonstrate weak spatial grounding and fail to account for major obstructions, leading to recommendations that would result in simulated crashes. In indoor robotics tasks, VLMs either miss safety hazards or behave excessively conservatively, producing false alarms and reducing operational efficiency. By identifying structured and interpretable failure modes, REVELIO offers actionable insights that can support targeted VLM safety improvements.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Chain-of-thought reasoning for driving, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 22 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2026.

Builds on

22 of 37 references.

References · 22

  1. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
  2. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,234
  3. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
  4. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,449
  5. 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?cited by 604
  6. 2024VLMEvalKit: An Open-Source Toolkit for Evaluating Large Multi-Modality Modelscited by 455
  7. 2021A Comprehensive Survey of Scene Graphs: Generation and Applicationcited by 125
  8. 2025Are VLMs Ready for Autonomous Driving? An Empirical Study from the Reliability, Data, and Metric Perspectivescited by 122
  9. 2023Concept-based Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Surveycited by 98
  10. 2018Scenic: A Language for Scenario Specification and Scene Generationcited by 83
  11. 2023Explain Any Concept: Segment Anything Meets Concept-Based Explanationcited by 37
  12. 2025ManipBench: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Low-Level Robot Manipulationcited by 24
10 more
  1. 2025ADVEDM:Fine-grained Adversarial Attack against VLM-based Embodied Agentscited by 23
  2. 2019Failure Modes in Machine Learning Systemscited by 15
  3. 2024On the Vulnerability of LLM/VLM-Controlled Roboticscited by 15
  4. 2026VLM-RobustBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Robustness of Vision-Language Modelscited by 14
  5. 2025Failure Modes in LLM Systems: A System-Level Taxonomy for Reliable AI Applicationscited by 10
  6. 2025Large Language Model-assisted Autonomous Vehicle Recovery from Immobilizationcited by 3
  7. 2025Best Subset Selection: Optimal Pursuit for Feature Selection and Eliminationcited by 1
  8. 2025Toward Inherently Robust VLMs Against Visual Perception Attackscited by 1
  9. 2026ScenicRules: An Autonomous Driving Benchmark with Multi-Objective Specifications and Abstract Scenarioscited by 1
  10. 2026Discovering Failure Modes in Vision-Language Models using RLcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025I-FailSense: Towards General Robotic Failure Detection with Vision-Language Models
  2. 2026FATE-VLA:Failue-aware test generation for vision-language-action models
  3. 2026FailBench: How Reliable are VLMs at Judging Robot Task Success?
  4. 2026Hazard or Anomaly? Evaluating VLMs for Understanding Dangers and Discrepancies
  5. 2026Hide-and-Seek in Trajectories: Discovering Failure Signals for VLA Runtime Monitoring
  6. 2024Addressing Failures in Robotics using Vision-Based Language Models (VLMs) and Behavior Trees (BT)
  7. 2026VLA-FAIL: Efficient Task Failure Detection for Finetuned Vision-Language-Action Models
  8. 2025FailSafe: Reasoning and Recovery from Failures in Vision-Language-Action Models