mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PIVOT: Bridging Planning and Execution in LLM Agents via Trajectory Refinement

arXiv 2605.11225 ↗First posted 11 May 2026cs.AI cs.LG cs.MAcited by 4

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language model (LLM)-based agents frequently generate seemingly coherent plans that fail upon execution due to infeasible actions, constraint violations, and compounding errors over extended horizons. PIVOT (Plan-Inspect-eVOlve Trajectories) addresses this plan-execution misalignment through a self-supervised framework that treats trajectories as optimizable objects iteratively refined via environment interaction. The framework comprises four stages: PLAN generates candidate trajectories; INSPECT executes them and computes structured losses with textual gradients encoding plan-execution discrepancies; EVOLVE applies these signals to produce improved trajectories; and VERIFY performs a final global check against task constraints. A monotonic acceptance process ensures a non-decreasing solution quality. Empirical evaluations on DeepPlanning and GAIA demonstrate state-of-the-art performance: with human-in-the-loop (HITL) feedback, PIVOT establishes a strong upper bound up to 94% relative improvement in constraint satisfaction, while its fully autonomous variant retains substantial gains, showing that the core trajectory-refinement mechanism remains effective without external supervision. At the same time, PIVOT remains computationally efficient, requiring up to 3x to 5x fewer tokens than competing refinement methods. These findings establish that (self- or human-supervised) feedback-based trajectory optimization is a principled methodology for mitigating plan-execution gaps in autonomous agent systems.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 23 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.

Builds on

23 of 27 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026DeepPlanning: Benchmarking Long-Horizon Agentic Planning with Verifiable Constraints26 Jan
  2. 2025Model-First Reasoning LLM Agents: Reducing Hallucinations through Explicit Problem Modeling16 Dec
  3. 2025SE-Agent: Self-Evolution Trajectory Optimization in Multi-Step Reasoning with LLM-Based Agents4 Aug
  4. 2025Enhancing LLM-Based Agents via Global Planning and Hierarchical Execution23 Apr
  5. 2025VeriLA: A Human-Centered Evaluation Framework for Interpretable Verification of LLM Agent Failures16 Mar
  6. 2024Testing and Understanding Erroneous Planning in LLM Agents through Synthesized User Inputs27 Apr

Other references · 17

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  3. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  4. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
  5. 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,084
  6. 2023CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquingcited by 751
  7. 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?cited by 559
  8. 2023Active Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 506
  9. 2023PromptAgent: Strategic Planning with Language Models Enables Expert-level Prompt Optimizationcited by 226
  10. 2025Which Agent Causes Task Failures and When? On Automated Failure Attribution of LLM Multi-Agent Systemscited by 170
  11. 2025Where LLM Agents Fail and How They can Learn From Failurescited by 118
  12. 2025AgenTracer: Who Is Inducing Failure in the LLM Agentic Systems?cited by 105
5 more
  1. 2025TRAIL: Trace Reasoning and Agentic Issue Localizationcited by 98
  2. 2025Enhancing LLM Planning Capabilities through Intrinsic Self-Critiquecited by 7
  3. 2026MAESTRO: Multi-Agent Evaluation Suite for Testing, Reliability, and Observabilitycited by 6
  4. 2026Localizing and Correcting Errors for LLM-based Plannerscited by 3
  5. 2025Human-in-the-Loop Systems for Adaptive Learning Using Generative AIcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Plan-and-Act: Improving Planning of Agents for Long-Horizon Tasks
  2. 2026Training the Orchestrator: A Supervised Approach to End-to-End PDDL Planning with LLM Agents
  3. 2026Trace2Skill: Distill Trajectory-Local Lessons into Transferable Agent Skills
  4. 2024AgentGen: Enhancing Planning Abilities for Large Language Model based Agent via Environment and Task Generation
  5. 2026PDEU-Bench: Benchmarking the Personalized Planning Lifecycle of Tool-Calling LLM Agents
  6. 2026PseudoAct: Leveraging Pseudocode Synthesis for Flexible Planning and Action Control in Large Language Model Agents
  7. 2026Agentic LLM Planning via Step-Wise PDDL Simulation: An Empirical Characterisation
  8. 2026OTAP: Structure-Aware Optimal Transport for Evaluating Planning and Execution in Agent Trajectories