mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Enhancing LLM Planning Capabilities through Intrinsic Self-Critique

arXiv 2512.24103 ↗First posted 30 Dec 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We demonstrate an approach for LLMs to critique their own answers with the goal of enhancing their performance that leads to significant improvements over established planning benchmarks. Despite the findings of earlier research that has cast doubt on the effectiveness of LLMs leveraging self critique methods, we show significant performance gains on planning datasets in the Blocksworld domain through intrinsic self-critique, without external source such as a verifier. We also demonstrate similar improvements on Logistics and Mini-grid datasets, exceeding strong baseline accuracies. We employ a few-shot learning technique and progressively extend it to a many-shot approach as our base method and demonstrate that it is possible to gain substantial improvement on top of this already competitive approach by employing an iterative process for correction and refinement. We illustrate how self-critique can significantly boost planning performance. Our empirical results present new state-of-the-art on the class of models considered, namely LLM model checkpoints from October 2024. Our primary focus lies on the method itself, demonstrating intrinsic self-improvement capabilities that are applicable regardless of the specific model version, and we believe that applying our method to more complex search techniques and more capable models will lead to even better performance.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Dec 2025.

Builds on

15 of 22 references.

References · 15

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  3. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  4. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  5. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  6. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
  7. 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 965
  8. 2023Beyond Human Data: Scaling Self-Training for Problem-Solving with Language Modelscited by 325
  9. 2023On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models : A Critical Investigationcited by 308
  10. 2022Generating Sequences by Learning to Self-Correctcited by 271
  11. 2024On the Self-Verification Limitations of Large Language Models on Reasoning and Planning Taskscited by 137
  12. 2023Can Large Language Models Really Improve by Self-critiquing Their Own Plans?cited by 107
3 more
  1. 2024Chain of Thoughtlessness? An Analysis of CoT in Planningcited by 100
  2. 2023On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models (A Critical Investigation with a Proposed Benchmark)cited by 85
  3. 2024Exploring and Benchmarking the Planning Capabilities of Large Language Modelscited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.

7 papers.