mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

xi-DPO: Direct Preference Optimization via Ratio Reward Margin

arXiv 2605.10981 ↗First posted 9 May 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Reference-free preference optimization has emerged as an efficient alternative to reinforcement learning from human feedback, with Simple Preference Optimization(SimPO) demonstrating strong performance by eliminating the explicit reference model through a simple objective. However, the joint tuning of the hyperparameters β and γ in SimPO remains a central challenge. We argue that this difficulty arises because the margin formulation in SimPO is not easily interpretable across datasets with different reward gap structures. To better understand this issue, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of SimPO and find that β implicitly controls sample filtering, while the effect of γ depends on the reward gap structure of the dataset. Motivated by these observations, we propose xi-DPO: Direct preference optimization via ratio reward margin. We first reformulate the preference objective through an equivalent transformation, changing the optimization target from maximizing the likelihood of reward gaps to minimizing the distance between reward gaps and optimal margins. Then, we redefine the reward in a ratio form between the chosen and rejected, which effectively cancels the effect of β and yields a bounded and interpretable margin. This margin is called the ratio reward margin and is denoted by xi. Unlike the margin γ in SimPO, xi explicitly represents the desired relative separation between chosen and rejected responses and can be determined from the initial reward gap distribution, avoiding repeated trial-and-error tuning. ....

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 27 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 May 2026.

Builds on

27 of 37 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025SimPER: A Minimalist Approach to Preference Alignment without Hyperparameters2 Feb
  2. 2024β-DPO: Direct Preference Optimization with Dynamic β11 Jul
  3. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
  4. 2024Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimization28 Mar
  5. 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model12 Mar
  6. 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translation16 Jan
  7. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
  8. 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignment14 Apr
  9. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 18

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  4. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  5. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
  6. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
  7. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,139
  8. 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,095
  9. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 839
  10. 2017Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learningcited by 687
  11. 2023WizardMath: Empowering Mathematical Reasoning for Large Language Models via Reinforced Evol-Instructcited by 625
  12. 2019RAT-SQL: Relation-Aware Schema Encoding and Linking for Text-to-SQL Parserscited by 424
6 more
  1. 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Expertscited by 376
  2. 2017Thinking Fast and Slow with Deep Learning and Tree Searchcited by 252
  3. 2019SParC: Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing in Contextcited by 144
  4. 2024Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization in Direct Alignment Algorithmscited by 143
  5. 2024ODIN: Disentangled Reward Mitigates Hacking in RLHFcited by 136
  6. 2025OmniSQL: Synthesizing High-quality Text-to-SQL Data at Scalecited by 91

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024AlphaDPO: Adaptive Reward Margin for Direct Preference Optimization
  2. 2025Why DPO is a Misspecified Estimator and How to Fix It
  3. 2026Uncertainty-Normalized Margins for Direct Preference Optimization
  4. 2026Boosting Direct Preference Optimization with Penalization
  5. 2025Adaptive Margin RLHF via Preference over Preferences
  6. 2025Margin Adaptive DPO: Leveraging Reward Model for Granular Control in Preference Optimization
  7. 2025Pre-DPO: Improving Data Utilization in Direct Preference Optimization Using a Guiding Reference Model
  8. 2025Length-Controlled Margin-Based Preference Optimization without Reference Model