mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Toward Better Geometric Representations for Molecule Generative Models

arXiv 2605.07693 ↗First posted 8 May 2026cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Geometric representation-conditioned molecule generation provides an effective paradigm that decouples molecule representation modeling from structure generation. By decoupling molecule generation into two stages-first generating a meaningful molecule representation, and then generating a 3D molecule conditioned on this representation-the efficiency and quality of the generation process can be significantly enhanced. However, its effectiveness is fundamentally limited by the quality of the representation space: pretrained molecular encoders, such as UniMol, produce representations that are non-smooth and not fully exploited during the generative training process. In this work, we propose LENSEs, a framework that better exploits the potential of molecule representations in representation-conditioned generation methods. In particular, LENSEs introduces three complementary mechanisms: (1) a representation head, simultaneously trained during generative tasks, that extracts multi-level representations from the pretrained encoder; (2) a molecule perceptual loss that optimizes the generator in a semantic-informative representation space; and (3) a node-level representation alignment (REPA) loss that explicitly aligns the generator's hidden states with encoder representations, reducing the semantic gap between pretraining and generation. We demonstrate the effectiveness of these improvements through extensive molecule generation tasks. Specifically, on the challenging molecule generation dataset GEOM-DRUG, LENSEs achieves 97.28% validity and 98.51% molecule stability, surpassing existing advanced methods. Further analyses through Lipschitz constant reduction (4.6x) and QM9 probing tasks also demonstrate the smoother, more informative refined representations, establishing generative training with alignment objectives as a potential pretraining paradigm for molecular encoders.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.

Builds on

40 of 58 references.

References · 40

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  2. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  3. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  4. 2020Denoising Diffusion Implicit Modelscited by 9,781
  5. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
  6. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,036
  7. 2016Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolutioncited by 2,694
  8. 2013Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computationcited by 2,079
  9. 2024Representation Alignment for Generation: Training Diffusion Transformers Is Easier Than You Thinkcited by 703
  10. 2022Equivariant Diffusion for Molecule Generation in 3Dcited by 677
  11. 2022GeoDiff: a Geometric Diffusion Model for Molecular Conformation Generationcited by 516
  12. 2022DiffDock: Diffusion Steps, Twists, and Turns for Molecular Dockingcited by 313
28 more
  1. 2020GEOM: Energy-annotated molecular conformations for property prediction and molecular generationcited by 243
  2. 2022Structure-based Drug Design with Equivariant Diffusion Modelscited by 217
  3. 2023Geometric Latent Diffusion Models for 3D Molecule Generationcited by 186
  4. 20233D Equivariant Diffusion for Target-Aware Molecule Generation and Affinity Predictioncited by 177
  5. 2022SPIn-NeRF: Multiview Segmentation and Perceptual Inpainting with Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 144
  6. 2022Pre-training via Denoising for Molecular Property Predictioncited by 124
  7. 2023MiDi: Mixed Graph and 3D Denoising Diffusion for Molecule Generationcited by 98
  8. 2023Return of Unconditional Generation: A Self-supervised Representation Generation Methodcited by 98
  9. 2023Diffusion Model as Representation Learnercited by 95
  10. 2024Mixed Continuous and Categorical Flow Matching for 3D De Novo Molecule Generationcited by 54
  11. 2023Navigating the Design Space of Equivariant Diffusion-Based Generative Models for De Novo 3D Molecule Generationcited by 50
  12. 2024SemlaFlow -- Efficient 3D Molecular Generation with Latent Attention and Equivariant Flow Matchingcited by 41
  13. 2023Geometry-Complete Diffusion for 3D Molecule Generation and Optimizationcited by 37
  14. 2022Group SELFIES: A Robust Fragment-Based Molecular String Representationcited by 33
  15. 2023Fractional Denoising for 3D Molecular Pre-trainingcited by 33
  16. 2024A Survey of Generative AI for de novo Drug Design: New Frontiers in Molecule and Protein Generationcited by 29
  17. 2023Learning Joint 2D & 3D Diffusion Models for Complete Molecule Generationcited by 27
  18. 2025FlowMol3: Flow Matching for 3D De Novo Small-Molecule Generationcited by 21
  19. 2024Geometric Representation Condition Improves Equivariant Molecule Generationcited by 13
  20. 2025Applications of Modular Co-Design for De Novo 3D Molecule Generationcited by 13
  21. 2025Learning Diffusion Models with Flexible Representation Guidancecited by 13
  22. 2024Accelerating 3D Molecule Generation via Jointly Geometric Optimal Transportcited by 11
  23. 2026Rethinking Diffusion Models with Symmetries through Canonicalization with Applications to Molecular Graph Generationcited by 7
  24. 2025MolVision: Molecular Property Prediction with Vision Language Modelscited by 5
  25. 2026Self-Conditioned Denoising for Atomistic Representation Learningcited by 4
  26. 2025GeoRecon: Graph-Level Representation Learning for 3D Molecules via Reconstruction-Based Pretrainingcited by 3
  27. 20263D Molecule Generation from Rigid Motifs via SE(3) Flowscited by 3
  28. 2025Multi-Modal Molecular Representation Learning via Structure Awarenesscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.