mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Retrieve, Integrate, and Synthesize: Spatial-Semantic Grounded Latent Visual Reasoning

arXiv 2605.07106 ↗First posted 8 May 2026cs.CLcited by 6

On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have made remarkable progress on vision-language reasoning, yet most methods still compress visual evidence into discrete textual thoughts, creating an information bottleneck for fine-grained perception. Recent latent visual reasoning methods attempt to reason in continuous hidden states, but we find that they suffer from insufficient manifold compatibility: latent trajectories drift away from pretrained reasoning circuits, collapse into instance-agnostic patterns, and are often bypassed during answer generation. To address these issues, we propose RIS (Retrieve, Integrate, and Synthesize), a spatial-semantic grounded framework that develops latent reasoning as a compatible extension of pretrained MLLM computation. We first construct a step-wise grounded reasoning dataset with bounding boxes and region-specific semantic descriptions. Built on this supervision, RIS anchors latent tokens to both spatial and semantic evidence, enforces their causal role through a progressive attention bottleneck, and introduces short language transition tokens to bridge synthesized latent states back to vocabulary-aligned decoding. Experiments on V*, HRBench4K, HRBench8K, MMVP, and BLINK show consistent improvements over closed/open-source and latent reasoning baselines. Further analyses demonstrate that RIS learns diverse, interpretable, and progressively integrated latent trajectories, offering a practical path toward faithful internal visual reasoning in MLLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 15 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.

Builds on

15 of 28 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Imagination Helps Visual Reasoning, But Not Yet in Latent Space26 Feb
  2. 2025Monet: Reasoning in Latent Visual Space Beyond Images and Language26 Nov
  3. 2025Chain-of-Visual-Thought: Teaching VLMs to See and Think Better with Continuous Visual Tokens24 Nov
  4. 2025Latent Visual Reasoning29 Sep
  5. 2025Thinking with Images for Multimodal Reasoning: Foundations, Methods, and Future Frontiers30 Jun
  6. 2025Machine Mental Imagery: Empower Multimodal Reasoning with Latent Visual Tokens20 Jun
  7. 2025Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: A Comprehensive Survey16 Mar
  8. 2023MM-REACT: Prompting ChatGPT for Multimodal Reasoning and Action20 Mar
  9. 2023Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Language Models2 Feb

Other references · 6

  1. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
  2. 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,332
  3. 2024Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Spacecited by 797
  4. 2026The Latent Space: Foundation, Evolution, Mechanism, Ability, and Outlookcited by 43
  5. 2025LLM Latent Reasoning as Chain of Superpositioncited by 39
  6. 2025Jigsaw-R1: A Study of Rule-based Visual Reinforcement Learning with Jigsaw Puzzlescited by 36

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Visual Latents Know More Than They Say: Unsilencing Latent Reasoning in MLLMs
  2. 2026LanteRn: Latent Visual Structured Reasoning
  3. 2026SLVR: Structured Latent Visual Reasoning via Human-like Reasoning Flows
  4. 2026Leveraging Latent Visual Reasoning in Silence
  5. 2026Decompose, Look, and Reason: Reinforced Latent Reasoning for VLMs
  6. 2026Beyond Visual Memory: Mechanistic Diagnostics of Latent Visual Reasoning
  7. 2026CrystaL: Spontaneous Emergence of Visual Latents in MLLMs
  8. 2026Fill the GAP: A Granular Alignment Paradigm for Visual Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models