mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning in Compact Spaces with Approximately Normalized Transformer

arXiv 2505.22014 ↗First posted 28 May 2025cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The successful training of deep neural networks requires addressing challenges such as overfitting, numerical instabilities leading to divergence, and increasing variance in the residual stream. A common solution is to apply regularization and normalization techniques that usually require tuning additional hyperparameters. An alternative is to force all parameters and representations to lie on a hypersphere. This removes the need for regularization and increases convergence speed, but comes with additional costs. In this work, we propose a more holistic, approximate normalization via simple scalar multiplications motivated by the tight concentration of the norms of high-dimensional random vectors. Additionally, instead of applying strict normalization for the parameters, we constrain their norms. These modifications remove the need for weight decay and learning rate warm-up as well, but do not increase the total number of normalization layers. Our experiments with transformer architectures show up to 40% faster convergence compared to GPT models with QK normalization, with only 3% additional runtime cost. When deriving scaling laws, we found that our method enables training with larger batch sizes while preserving the favorable scaling characteristics of classic GPT architectures.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2025.

Builds on

28 of 40 references.

References · 28

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  4. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  5. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
  6. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  7. 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
  8. 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,611
  9. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
  10. 2020GLU Variants Improve Transformercited by 1,724
  11. 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,425
  12. 2020On Layer Normalization in the Transformer Architecturecited by 906
16 more
  1. 2022GPT-NeoX-20B: An Open-Source Autoregressive Language Modelcited by 711
  2. 2024DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermismcited by 621
  3. 2021High-Performance Large-Scale Image Recognition Without Normalizationcited by 359
  4. 2020Query-Key Normalization for Transformerscited by 266
  5. 2020ReZero is All You Need: Fast Convergence at Large Depthcited by 260
  6. 2020Understanding the Difficulty of Training Transformerscited by 210
  7. 2023Small-scale proxies for large-scale Transformer training instabilitiescited by 182
  8. 2019Transformers without Tears: Improving the Normalization of Self-Attentioncited by 153
  9. 2021Characterizing signal propagation to close the performance gap in unnormalized ResNetscited by 87
  10. 2024Resolving Discrepancies in Compute-Optimal Scaling of Language Modelscited by 84
  11. 2025Transformers without Normalizationcited by 69
  12. 2024nGPT: Normalized Transformer with Representation Learning on the Hyperspherecited by 68
  13. 2025The Curse of Depth in Large Language Modelscited by 58
  14. 2023Simplifying Transformer Blockscited by 37
  15. 2024You can remove GPT2's LayerNorm by fine-tuningcited by 11
  16. 2023Improving Deep Learning Optimization through Constrained Parameter Regularizationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

5 papers.