mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LAVA: Layered Audio-Visual Anti-tampering Watermarking for Robust Deepfake Detection and Localization

arXiv 2604.23957 ↗First posted 27 Apr 2026cs.CVcited by 3

On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models

Abstract (arXiv)

Proactive watermarking offers a promising approach for deepfake tamper detection and localization in short-form videos. However, existing methods often decouple audio and visual evidence and assume that watermark signals remain reliable under real-world degradations, making tamper localization vulnerable to multimodal misalignment and compression distortions. Moreover, existing semi-fragile visual watermarking methods often degrade significantly under codec compression because their embedding bands overlap with compression-sensitive frequency regions. To address these limitations, we propose Layered Audio-Visual Anti-tampering Watermarking (LAVA), a calibration-aware audio-visual watermark fusion framework for deepfake tamper detection and localization. LAVA leverages cross-modal watermark fusion and calibration-aware alignment to preserve consistent and reliable tamper evidence under compression and audio-visual asynchrony, enabling robust tamper localization. Extensive experiments demonstrate that LAVA achieves near-perfect detection performance (AP = 0.999), remains robust to compression and multimodal misalignment, and significantly improves tamper localization reliability over existing audio-visual fusion baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 18 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Apr 2026.

Builds on

18 of 36 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  2. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  3. 2018VoxCeleb2: Deep Speaker Recognitioncited by 862
  4. 2020A Lip Sync Expert Is All You Need for Speech to Lip Generation In The Wildcited by 669
  5. 2020Thinking in Frequency: Face Forgery Detection by Mining Frequency-aware Cluescited by 518
  6. 2019Face X-ray for More General Face Forgery Detectioncited by 469
  7. 2018HiDDeN: Hiding Data With Deep Networkscited by 384
  8. 2022Detecting Deepfakes with Self-Blended Imagescited by 332
  9. 2019StegaStamp: Invisible Hyperlinks in Physical Photographscited by 256
  10. 2023UCF: Uncovering Common Features for Generalizable Deepfake Detectioncited by 177
  11. 2020End-to-end anti-spoofing with RawNet2cited by 160
  12. 2022Leveraging Real Talking Faces via Self-Supervision for Robust Forgery Detectioncited by 130
6 more
  1. 2021MBRS : Enhancing Robustness of DNN-based Watermarking by Mini-Batch of Real and Simulated JPEG Compressioncited by 108
  2. 2020Not made for each other- Audio-Visual Dissonance-based Deepfake Detection and Localizationcited by 89
  3. 2023AV-Deepfake1M: A Large-Scale LLM-Driven Audio-Visual Deepfake Datasetcited by 79
  4. 2024Deepfake Generation and Detection: A Benchmark and Surveycited by 66
  5. 2024Video Seal: Open and Efficient Video Watermarkingcited by 45
  6. 2023Glitch in the Matrix: A Large Scale Benchmark for Content Driven Audio-Visual Forgery Detection and Localizationcited by 42

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.