mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Power of Power Law: Asymmetry Enables Compositional Reasoning

arXiv 2604.22951 ↗First posted 24 Apr 2026cs.AI cs.CL cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Natural language data follows a power-law distribution, with most knowledge and skills appearing at very low frequency. While a common intuition suggests that reweighting or curating data towards a uniform distribution may help models better learn these long-tail skills, we find a counterintuitive result: across a wide range of compositional reasoning tasks, such as state tracking and multi-step arithmetic, training under power-law distributions consistently outperforms training under uniform distributions. To understand this advantage, we introduce a minimalist skill-composition task and show that learning under a power-law distribution provably requires significantly less training data. Our theoretical analysis reveals that power law sampling induces a beneficial asymmetry that improves the pathological loss landscape, which enables models to first acquire high-frequency skill compositions with low data complexity, which in turn serves as a stepping stone to efficiently learn rare long-tailed skills. Our results offer an alternative perspective on what constitutes an effective data distribution for training models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 55 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2026.

Builds on

55 of 66 references.

References · 55

  1. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  2. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
  3. 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Modelscited by 1,054
  4. 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 556
  5. 2016Linear Convergence of Gradient and Proximal-Gradient Methods Under the Polyak-Lojasiewicz Conditioncited by 526
  6. 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 519
  7. 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 510
  8. 2023MQuAKE: Assessing Knowledge Editing in Language Models via Multi-Hop Questionscited by 292
  9. 2022Transformers Learn Shortcuts to Automatacited by 260
  10. 2024Chain of Thought Empowers Transformers to Solve Inherently Serial Problemscited by 256
  11. 2024From Explicit CoT to Implicit CoT: Learning to Internalize CoT Step by Stepcited by 225
  12. 2023Task Arithmetic in the Tangent Space: Improved Editing of Pre-Trained Modelscited by 218
38 more
  1. 2022The Parallelism Tradeoff: Limitations of Log-Precision Transformerscited by 191
  2. 2022Hidden Progress in Deep Learning: SGD Learns Parities Near the Computational Limitcited by 184
  3. 2024Do Large Language Models Latently Perform Multi-Hop Reasoning?cited by 165
  4. 2022Neural Networks can Learn Representations with Gradient Descentcited by 161
  5. 2025Scaling Latent Reasoning via Looped Language Modelscited by 145
  6. 2020Rethinking Class-Balanced Methods for Long-Tailed Visual Recognition from a Domain Adaptation Perspectivecited by 143
  7. 2023Physics of Language Models: Part 3.2, Knowledge Manipulationcited by 142
  8. 2022The merged-staircase property: a necessary and nearly sufficient condition for SGD learning of sparse functions on two-layer neural networkscited by 141
  9. 2023The Quantization Model of Neural Scalingcited by 137
  10. 2023Representational Strengths and Limitations of Transformerscited by 132
  11. 2023Skill-it! A Data-Driven Skills Framework for Understanding and Training Language Modelscited by 120
  12. 2023A Theory for Emergence of Complex Skills in Language Modelscited by 111
  13. 2024Physics of Language Models: Part 2.1, Grade-School Math and the Hidden Reasoning Processcited by 107
  14. 2024Metacognitive Capabilities of LLMs: An Exploration in Mathematical Problem Solvingcited by 82
  15. 2024Grokked Transformers are Implicit Reasoners: A Mechanistic Journey to the Edge of Generalizationcited by 78
  16. 2024Hopping Too Late: Exploring the Limitations of Large Language Models on Multi-Hop Queriescited by 78
  17. 2020Learning Parities with Neural Networkscited by 77
  18. 2023Skill-Mix: a Flexible and Expandable Family of Evaluations for AI modelscited by 64
  19. 2024On Limitations of the Transformer Architecturecited by 63
  20. 2021The staircase property: How hierarchical structure can guide deep learningcited by 62
  21. 2024Transformers Provably Solve Parity Efficiently with Chain of Thoughtcited by 49
  22. 2024Understanding and Patching Compositional Reasoning in LLMscited by 45
  23. 2024Theoretical limitations of multi-layer Transformercited by 43
  24. 2025Learning Compositional Functions with Transformers from Easy-to-Hard Datacited by 34
  25. 2023Gradient-Based Feature Learning under Structured Datacited by 32
  26. 2025Transformers Learn to Implement Multi-step Gradient Descent with Chain of Thoughtcited by 32
  27. 2024From Sparse Dependence to Sparse Attention: Unveiling How Chain-of-Thought Enhances Transformer Sample Efficiencycited by 28
  28. 2023Provable Advantage of Curriculum Learning on Parity Targets with Mixed Inputscited by 22
  29. 2023A Mathematical Model for Curriculum Learning for Paritiescited by 19
  30. 2024Can Models Learn Skill Composition from Examples?cited by 17
  31. 2025How do Transformers Learn Implicit Reasoning?cited by 15
  32. 2024Investigating Multi-Hop Factual Shortcuts in Knowledge Editing of Large Language Modelscited by 14
  33. 2023Learning Multi-Step Reasoning by Solving Arithmetic Taskscited by 12
  34. 2025Transformers Provably Learn Chain-of-Thought Reasoning with Length Generalizationcited by 12
  35. 2025Language models can learn implicit multi-hop reasoning, but only if they have lots of training datacited by 11
  36. 2024Enhancing Multi-hop Reasoning through Knowledge Erasure in Large Language Model Editingcited by 9
  37. 2025CaKE: Circuit-aware Editing Enables Generalizable Knowledge Learnerscited by 9
  38. 2025Asymptotics of SGD in Sequence-Single Index Models and Single-Layer Attention Networkscited by 9

50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)

Built on by

Not cited yet.