Language models can learn implicit multi-hop reasoning, but only if they have lots of training data
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Implicit reasoning is the ability of a language model to solve multi-hop reasoning tasks in a single forward pass, without chain of thought. We investigate this capability using GPT2-style language models trained from scratch on controlled k-hop reasoning datasets (k = 2, 3, 4). We show that while such models can indeed learn implicit k-hop reasoning, the required training data grows exponentially in k, and the required number of transformer layers grows linearly in k. We offer a theoretical explanation for why this depth growth is necessary. We further find that the data requirement can be mitigated, but not eliminated, through curriculum learning.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 23 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2025.
Builds on
23 of 48 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2022Language Models Are Greedy Reasoners: A Systematic Formal Analysis of Chain-of-Thought3 Oct
- 2021Show Your Work: Scratchpads for Intermediate Computation with Language Models30 Nov
Other references · 21
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
- 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,218
- 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,831
- 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,244
- 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 839
- 2024Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Spacecited by 797
9 more
- 2022Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasetscited by 629
- 2024Do NOT Think That Much for 2+3=? On the Overthinking of o1-Like LLMscited by 570
- 2024From Explicit CoT to Implicit CoT: Learning to Internalize CoT Step by Stepcited by 235
- 2023Explaining grokking through circuit efficiencycited by 111
- 2024Theoretical limitations of multi-layer Transformercited by 45
- 2024Do Large Language Models Perform Latent Multi-Hop Reasoning without Exploiting Shortcuts?cited by 28
- 2023Average-Hard Attention Transformers are Constant-Depth Uniform Threshold Circuitscited by 26
- 2024Critical Data Size of Language Models from a Grokking Perspectivecited by 24
- 2025Strassen Attention, Split VC Dimension and Compositionality in Transformerscited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 8.
11 papers.
- 2025Scaling Latent Reasoning via Looped Language Modelscited by 165
- 2026Loop the Loopies!cited by 8
- 2025Benefits and Limitations of Communication in Multi-Agent Reasoningcited by 7
- 2025Rote Learning Considered Useful: Generalizing over Memorized Data in LLMscited by 5
- 2026Layer-Order Inversion: Rethinking Latent Multi-Hop Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 3
- 2026Opening the Black Box: A Survey on the Mechanisms of Multi-Step Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026The Power of Power Law: Asymmetry Enables Compositional Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Multi-Hop Knowledge Composition is Bound by Pretraining Exposurecited by 0
- 2026Disentangling Curriculum Learning in NLP: Towards a Unifying Taxonomycited by 0
- 2026How Many Thoughts Can a Vector Hold? The Capacity of Reasoning by Superpositioncited by 0
- 2026AgentVidBench: A Multi-Hop Video Question Answering Benchmark for Evaluating MLLM Agentscited by 0
- 2026AgentVidBench: A Multi-Hop Video Question Answering Benchmark for Evaluating MLLM Agents18 Sep 2026
- 2026How Many Thoughts Can a Vector Hold? The Capacity of Reasoning by Superposition12 Sep 2026
- 2026Disentangling Curriculum Learning in NLP: Towards a Unifying Taxonomy21 Jul 2026
- 2026Loop the Loopies!17 Jul 2026
- 2026Multi-Hop Knowledge Composition is Bound by Pretraining Exposure8 Jun 2026
- 2026The Power of Power Law: Asymmetry Enables Compositional Reasoning24 Apr 2026
- 2026Layer-Order Inversion: Rethinking Latent Multi-Hop Reasoning in Large Language Models7 Jan 2026
- 2026Opening the Black Box: A Survey on the Mechanisms of Multi-Step Reasoning in Large Language Models2 Jan 2026
- 2025Scaling Latent Reasoning via Looped Language Models29 Oct 2025
- 2025Benefits and Limitations of Communication in Multi-Agent Reasoning14 Oct 2025
- 2025Rote Learning Considered Useful: Generalizing over Memorized Data in LLMs29 Jul 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025How do Transformers Learn Implicit Reasoning?
- 2024Large Language Models Still Face Challenges in Multi-Hop Reasoning with External Knowledge
- 2025Implicit Reasoning in Transformers is Reasoning through Shortcuts
- 2025Finding the Minimal Parameter Budget for Implicit Reasoning: A Data Complexity Driven Scaling Law for Language Models
- 2026Loop, Think, & Generalize: Implicit Reasoning in Recurrent-Depth Transformers
- 2024Seemingly Plausible Distractors in Multi-Hop Reasoning: Are Large Language Models Attentive Readers?
- 2025Implicit Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey
- 2025Reasoning with Latent Thoughts: On the Power of Looped Transformers