mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

How do Transformers Learn Implicit Reasoning?

arXiv 2505.23653 ↗First posted 29 May 2025cs.LGcited by 15

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent work suggests that large language models (LLMs) can perform multi-hop reasoning implicitly -- producing correct answers without explicitly verbalizing intermediate steps -- but the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this paper, we study how such implicit reasoning emerges by training transformers from scratch in a controlled symbolic environment. Our analysis reveals a three-stage developmental trajectory: early memorization, followed by in-distribution generalization, and eventually cross-distribution generalization. We find that training with atomic triples is not necessary but accelerates learning, and that second-hop generalization relies on query-level exposure to specific compositional structures. To interpret these behaviors, we introduce two diagnostic tools: cross-query semantic patching, which identifies semantically reusable intermediate representations, and a cosine-based representational lens, which reveals that successful reasoning correlates with the cosine-base clustering in hidden space. This clustering phenomenon in turn provides a coherent explanation for the behavioral dynamics observed across training, linking representational structure to reasoning capability. These findings provide new insights into the interpretability of implicit multi-hop reasoning in LLMs, helping to clarify how complex reasoning processes unfold internally and offering pathways to enhance the transparency of such models.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 20 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2025.

Builds on

20 of 42 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Report14 May
  2. 2025Memorizing is Not Enough: Deep Knowledge Injection Through Reasoning1 Apr

Other references · 18

  1. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  2. 2025Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMscited by 1,193
  3. 2024Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Spacecited by 763
  4. 2025Towards Reasoning Era: A Survey of Long Chain-of-Thought for Reasoning Large Language Modelscited by 381
  5. 2025ThinkPrune: Pruning Long Chain-of-Thought of LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 187
  6. 2024Let's Think Dot by Dot: Hidden Computation in Transformer Language Modelscited by 186
  7. 2025Reasoning Models Can Be Effective Without Thinkingcited by 182
  8. 2024Distilling System 2 into System 1cited by 152
  9. 2024Locate-then-edit for Multi-hop Factual Recall under Knowledge Editingcited by 36
  10. 2024Do Large Language Models Perform Latent Multi-Hop Reasoning without Exploiting Shortcuts?cited by 26
  11. 2024Distributional reasoning in LLMs: Parallel reasoning processes in multi-hop reasoningcited by 21
  12. 2024Lessons from Studying Two-Hop Latent Reasoningcited by 15
6 more
  1. 2025Is the Reversal Curse a Binding Problem? Uncovering Limitations of Transformers from a Basic Generalization Failurecited by 13
  2. 2024AtomR: Atomic Operator-Empowered Large Language Models for Heterogeneous Knowledge Reasoningcited by 10
  3. 2024Enhancing Multi-hop Reasoning through Knowledge Erasure in Large Language Model Editingcited by 9
  4. 2025CaKE: Circuit-aware Editing Enables Generalizable Knowledge Learnerscited by 9
  5. 2024Towards Interpreting Language Models: A Case Study in Multi-Hop Reasoningcited by 4
  6. 2024Understanding Hidden Computations in Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 9.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Grokked Transformers are Implicit Reasoners: A Mechanistic Journey to the Edge of Generalization
  2. 2026Loop, Think, & Generalize: Implicit Reasoning in Recurrent-Depth Transformers
  3. 2025Language models can learn implicit multi-hop reasoning, but only if they have lots of training data
  4. 2025Implicit Reasoning in Transformers is Reasoning through Shortcuts
  5. 2026Think Deep, Speak Once: Relit, A Recursive Latent Implicit Transformer Framework
  6. 2025Relational reasoning and inductive bias in transformers and large language models
  7. 2026Multi-Hop Knowledge Composition is Bound by Pretraining Exposure
  8. 2026Unveiling the Reasoning Process of Large Language Models