mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adaptive Test-Time Compute Allocation with Evolving In-Context Demonstrations

arXiv 2604.21018 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2026cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

While scaling test-time compute can substantially improve model performance, existing approaches either rely on static compute allocation or sample from fixed generation distributions. In this work, we introduce a test-time compute allocation framework that jointly adapts where computation is spent and how generation is performed. Our method begins with a warm-up phase that identifies easy queries and assembles an initial pool of question-response pairs from the test set itself. An adaptive phase then concentrates further computation on unresolved queries while reshaping their generation distributions through evolving in-context demonstrations -- conditioning each generation on successful responses from semantically related queries rather than resampling from a fixed distribution. Experiments across math, coding, and reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms existing baselines while consuming substantially less inference-time compute.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 16 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2026.

Builds on

16 of 54 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025On the Role of Temperature Sampling in Test-Time Scaling2 Oct
  2. 2025Rethinking the Unsolvable: When In-Context Search Meets Test-Time Scaling28 May
  3. 2025Rethinking Inference-Time Scaling: Efficiency Limits and Linguistic Signals18 Apr
  4. 2025Adaptive Rectification Sampling for Test-Time Compute Scaling2 Apr
  5. 2024Adaptive Inference-Time Compute: LLMs Can Predict if They Can Do Better, Even Mid-Generation3 Oct

Other references · 11

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  2. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  3. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  4. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
  5. 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,195
  6. 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 991
  7. 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 901
  8. 2024Hallucination is Inevitable: An Innate Limitation of Large Language Modelscited by 332
  9. 2025Why Language Models Hallucinatecited by 220
  10. 2016An optimal algorithm for the Thresholding Bandit Problemcited by 62
  11. 2025Self-Improving LLM Agents at Test-Timecited by 30

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026What If We Allocate Test-Time Compute Adaptively?
  2. 2025Strategic Scaling of Test-Time Compute: A Bandit Learning Approach
  3. 2026Adaptive Test-Time Compute Allocation for Reasoning LLMs via Constrained Policy Optimization
  4. 2025A Survey of Test-Time Compute: From Intuitive Inference to Deliberate Reasoning
  5. 2025Latency and Token-Aware Test-Time Compute
  6. 2025Scaling over Scaling: Exploring Test-Time Scaling Plateau in Large Reasoning Models
  7. 2025ARISE: An Adaptive Resolution-Aware Metric for Test-Time Scaling Evaluation in Large Reasoning Models
  8. 2026Planned Test-Time Scaling with Coordinated Reasoning Paths