mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Calibrating conditional risk

arXiv 2604.20409 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2026cs.LG stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce and study the problem of calibrating conditional risk, which involves estimating the expected loss of a prediction model conditional on input features. We analyze this problem in both classification and regression settings and show that it is fundamentally equivalent to a standard regression task. For classification settings, we further establish a connection between conditional risk calibration and individual/conditional probability calibration, and develop theoretical insights for the performance metric. This reveals that while conditional risk calibration is related to existing uncertainty quantification problems, it remains a distinct and standalone machine learning problem. Empirically, we validate our theoretical findings and demonstrate the practical implications of conditional risk calibration in the learning to defer (L2D) framework. Our systematic experiments provide both qualitative and quantitative assessments, offering guidance for future research in uncertainty-aware decision-making.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2026.

Builds on

23 of 37 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  2. 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 813
  3. 2016Training Region-based Object Detectors with Online Hard Example Miningcited by 577
  4. 2019Learning Loss for Active Learningcited by 335
  5. 2019SelectiveNet: A Deep Neural Network with an Integrated Reject Optioncited by 333
  6. 2017Predict Responsibly: Improving Fairness and Accuracy by Learning to Defercited by 228
  7. 2020Learning to Complement Humanscited by 123
  8. 2019The Algorithmic Automation Problem: Prediction, Triage, and Human Effortcited by 101
  9. 2021Differentiable Learning Under Triagecited by 74
  10. 2021Towards Unbiased and Accurate Deferral to Multiple Expertscited by 71
  11. 2022Calibrated Learning to Defer with One-vs-All Classifierscited by 68
  12. 2023Who Should Predict? Exact Algorithms For Learning to Defer to Humanscited by 68
11 more
  1. 2020Individual Calibration with Randomized Forecastingcited by 50
  2. 2022Sample Efficient Learning of Predictors that Complement Humanscited by 46
  3. 2019Regression Under Human Assistancecited by 40
  4. 2023Predictor-Rejector Multi-Class Abstention: Theoretical Analysis and Algorithmscited by 36
  5. 2021Selective Regression Under Fairness Criteriacited by 34
  6. 2023Theoretically Grounded Loss Functions and Algorithms for Score-Based Multi-Class Abstentioncited by 32
  7. 2020Regression with reject option and application to kNNcited by 30
  8. 2017Active Learning Using Uncertainty Informationcited by 28
  9. 2021Preferential Mixture-of-Experts: Interpretable Models that Rely on Human Expertise as much as Possiblecited by 19
  10. 2023Regression with Cost-based Rejectioncited by 11
  11. 2023When No-Rejection Learning is Consistent for Regression with Rejectioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.