Towards Verified and Targeted Explanations through Formal Methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As deep neural networks are deployed in safety-critical domains such as autonomous driving and medical diagnosis, stakeholders need explanations that are interpretable but also trustworthy with formal guarantees. Existing XAI methods fall short: heuristic attribution techniques (e.g., LIME, Integrated Gradients) highlight influential features but offer no mathematical guarantees about decision boundaries, while formal methods verify robustness yet remain untargeted, analyzing the nearest boundary regardless of whether it represents a critical risk. In safety-critical systems, not all misclassifications carry equal consequences; confusing a "Stop" sign for a "60 kph" sign is far more dangerous than confusing it with a "No Passing" sign. We introduce ViTaX (Verified and Targeted Explanations), a formal XAI framework that generates targeted semifactual explanations with mathematical guarantees. For a given input (class y) and a user-specified critical alternative (class t), ViTaX: (1) identifies the minimal feature subset most sensitive to the y->t transition, and (2) applies formal reachability analysis to guarantee that perturbing these features by epsilon cannot flip the classification to t. We formalize this through Targeted epsilon-Robustness, certifying whether a feature subset remains robust under perturbation toward a specific target class. ViTaX is the first method to provide formally guaranteed explanations of a model's resilience against user-identified alternatives. Evaluations on MNIST, GTSRB, EMNIST, and TaxiNet demonstrate over 30% fidelity improvement with minimal explanation cardinality.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2026.
Builds on
47 of 71 references.
References · 47
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 990
- 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 744
- 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 445
- 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 444
35 more
- 2017Methods for Interpreting and Understanding Deep Neural Networkscited by 345
- 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 297
- 2016Safety Verification of Deep Neural Networkscited by 263
- 2020Algorithmic Recourse: from Counterfactual Explanations to Interventionscited by 250
- 2017Formal Verification of Piece-Wise Linear Feed-Forward Neural Networkscited by 242
- 2019Algorithms for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 221
- 2018Formal Security Analysis of Neural Networks using Symbolic Intervalscited by 185
- 2018Efficient Formal Safety Analysis of Neural Networkscited by 165
- 2018Abduction-Based Explanations for Machine Learning Modelscited by 160
- 2018A Symbolic Approach to Explaining Bayesian Network Classifierscited by 131
- 2020On The Reasons Behind Decisionscited by 100
- 2021PRIMA: General and Precise Neural Network Certification via Scalable Convex Hull Approximationscited by 77
- 2020Verification of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Using ImageStarscited by 75
- 2020On Generating Plausible Counterfactual and Semi-Factual Explanations for Deep Learningcited by 60
- 2021On Guaranteed Optimal Robust Explanations for NLP Modelscited by 54
- 2019Optimization and Abstraction: A Synergistic Approach for Analyzing Neural Network Robustnesscited by 40
- 2021SAT-Based Rigorous Explanations for Decision Listscited by 40
- 2022Formalising the Robustness of Counterfactual Explanations for Neural Networkscited by 24
- 2022Robust Explanation Constraints for Neural Networkscited by 24
- 2023Even if Explanations: Prior Work, Desiderata & Benchmarks for Semi-Factual XAIcited by 20
- 2020Validation of Image-Based Neural Network Controllers through Adaptive Stress Testingcited by 19
- 2022Scalable Verification of GNN-based Job Schedulerscited by 19
- 2023Convex Bounds on the Softmax Function with Applications to Robustness Verificationcited by 19
- 2022Neural Network Verification using Residual Reasoningcited by 18
- 2021Unsupervised Causal Binary Concepts Discovery with VAE for Black-box Model Explanationcited by 8
- 2023The Utility of "Even if..." Semifactual Explanation to Optimise Positive Outcomescited by 8
- 2022On Optimizing Back-Substitution Methods for Neural Network Verificationcited by 6
- 2024Formal Explanations for Neuro-Symbolic AIcited by 6
- 2016The minimal hitting set generation problem: algorithms and computationcited by 5
- 2023Optimizing over trained GNNs via symmetry breakingcited by 5
- 2024Formal Logic Enabled Personalized Federated Learning Through Property Inferencecited by 4
- 2025Probabilistic Robustness Analysis in High Dimensional Space: Application to Semantic Segmentation Networkcited by 3
- 2024MicroXercise: A Micro-Level Comparative and Explainable System for Remote Physical Therapycited by 2
- 2025Looking in the mirror: A faithful counterfactual explanation method for interpreting deep image classification modelscited by 2
- 2025A SAT-centered XAI method for Deep Learning based Video Understandingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.