Formal Explanations for Neuro-Symbolic AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite the practical success of Artificial Intelligence (AI), current neural AI algorithms face two significant issues. First, the decisions made by neural architectures are often prone to bias and brittleness. Second, when a chain of reasoning is required, neural systems often perform poorly. Neuro-symbolic artificial intelligence is a promising approach that tackles these (and other) weaknesses by combining the power of neural perception and symbolic reasoning. Meanwhile, the success of AI has made it critical to understand its behaviour, leading to the development of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). While neuro-symbolic AI systems have important advantages over purely neural AI, we still need to explain their actions, which are obscured by the interactions of the neural and symbolic components. To address the issue, this paper proposes a formal approach to explaining the decisions of neuro-symbolic systems. The approach hinges on the use of formal abductive explanations and on solving the neuro-symbolic explainability problem hierarchically. Namely, it first computes a formal explanation for the symbolic component of the system, which serves to identify a subset of the individual parts of neural information that needs to be explained. This is followed by explaining only those individual neural inputs, independently of each other, which facilitates succinctness of hierarchical formal explanations and helps to increase the overall performance of the approach. Experimental results for a few complex reasoning tasks demonstrate practical efficiency of the proposed approach, in comparison to purely neural systems, from the perspective of explanation size, explanation time, training time, model sizes, and the quality of explanations reported.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2024.
Builds on
21 of 62 references.
References · 21
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
- 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 721
- 2020Neurosymbolic AI: The 3rd Wavecited by 255
- 2020The Next Decade in AI: Four Steps Towards Robust Artificial Intelligencecited by 195
- 2018Abduction-Based Explanations for Machine Learning Modelscited by 160
- 2018A Symbolic Approach to Explaining Bayesian Network Classifierscited by 131
- 2018Reachability Analysis of Deep Neural Networks with Provable Guaranteescited by 93
9 more
- 2017Verifying Properties of Binarized Deep Neural Networkscited by 79
- 2023Scallop: A Language for Neurosymbolic Programmingcited by 63
- 2020Neurosymbolic Reinforcement Learning with Formally Verified Explorationcited by 49
- 2021Symbols as a Lingua Franca for Bridging Human-AI Chasm for Explainable and Advisable AI Systemscited by 36
- 2023The Inadequacy of Shapley Values for Explainabilitycited by 31
- 2022VeriX: Towards Verified Explainability of Deep Neural Networkscited by 30
- 2023Explainability is NOT a Gamecited by 23
- 2023From Robustness to Explainability and Back Againcited by 14
- 2023Explanations for Answer Set Programmingcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2025On the Promise for Assurance of Differentiable Neurosymbolic Reasoning Paradigmscited by 3
- 2025Neuro-Symbolic AI for Cybersecurity: State of the Art, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 2
- 2025ORION: Teaching Language Models to Reason Efficiently in the Language of Thoughtcited by 1
- 2025Fixed Point Explainabilitycited by 0
- 2026Towards Verified and Targeted Explanations through Formal Methodscited by 0
- 2026When Are Concept Bottleneck Model Explanations Faithful and Compact?cited by 0
- 2026When Are Concept Bottleneck Model Explanations Faithful and Compact?5 Oct 2026
- 2026Towards Verified and Targeted Explanations through Formal Methods5 Apr 2026
- 2025ORION: Teaching Language Models to Reason Efficiently in the Language of Thought28 Nov 2025
- 2025Neuro-Symbolic AI for Cybersecurity: State of the Art, Challenges, and Opportunities8 Sep 2025
- 2025Fixed Point Explainability18 May 2025
- 2025On the Promise for Assurance of Differentiable Neurosymbolic Reasoning Paradigms13 Feb 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Mapping the Neuro-Symbolic AI Landscape by Architectures: A Handbook on Augmenting Deep Learning Through Symbolic Reasoning
- 2026Neuro-Symbolic Artificial Intelligence: A Task-Directed Survey in the Black-Box Models Era
- 2025A Study on Neuro-Symbolic Artificial Intelligence: Healthcare Perspectives
- 2024A Mechanistic Explanatory Strategy for XAI
- 2023Deciphering Raw Data in Neuro-Symbolic Learning with Provable Guarantees
- 2026The Emergent Symbolic Structure of Artificial Neural Networks
- 2025A Comparative Study of Neurosymbolic AI Approaches to Interpretable Logical Reasoning
- 2022Is Neuro-Symbolic AI Meeting its Promise in Natural Language Processing? A Structured Review