mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Neural Network Verification using Residual Reasoning

arXiv 2208.03083 ↗First posted 5 Aug 2022cs.NEcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the increasing integration of neural networks as components in mission-critical systems, there is an increasing need to ensure that they satisfy various safety and liveness requirements. In recent years, numerous sound and complete verification methods have been proposed towards that end, but these typically suffer from severe scalability limitations. Recent work has proposed enhancing such verification techniques with abstraction-refinement capabilities, which have been shown to boost scalability: instead of verifying a large and complex network, the verifier constructs and then verifies a much smaller network, whose correctness implies the correctness of the original network. A shortcoming of such a scheme is that if verifying the smaller network fails, the verifier needs to perform a refinement step that increases the size of the network being verified, and then start verifying the new network from scratch - effectively "wasting" its earlier work on verifying the smaller network. In this paper, we present an enhancement to abstraction-based verification of neural networks, by using residual reasoning: the process of utilizing information acquired when verifying an abstract network, in order to expedite the verification of a refined network. In essence, the method allows the verifier to store information about parts of the search space in which the refined network is guaranteed to behave correctly, and allows it to focus on areas where bugs might be discovered. We implemented our approach as an extension to the Marabou verifier, and obtained promising results.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 5.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Towards Formal XAI: Formally Approximate Minimal Explanations of Neural Networkscited by 42
  2. 2024Verification-Guided Shielding for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
  3. 2025Explaining, Fast and Slow: Abstraction and Refinement of Provable Explanationscited by 13
  4. 2022veriFIRE: Verifying an Industrial, Learning-Based Wildfire Detection Systemcited by 12
  5. 2023Verifying Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 11
  6. 2022Tighter Abstract Queries in Neural Network Verificationcited by 8
  7. 2022On Optimizing Back-Substitution Methods for Neural Network Verificationcited by 6
  8. 2023Fully Automatic Neural Network Reduction for Formal Verificationcited by 6
  9. 2025Abstraction-Based Proof Production in Formal Verification of Neural Networkscited by 5
  10. 2024Towards Formal Verification of Deep Neural Networks for Object Detectioncited by 4
  11. 2024Safe and Reliable Training of Learning-Based Aerospace Controllerscited by 4
  12. 2025PICID: Proof-Driven Clause Learning in Neural Network Verificationcited by 3
6 more
  1. 2026Incremental Neural Network Verification via Learned Conflictscited by 2
  2. 2025Bridging Efficiency and Safety: Formal Verification of Neural Networks with Early Exitscited by 1
  3. 2026Talking with Verifiers: Automatic Specification Generation for Neural Network Verificationcited by 0
  4. 2026Towards Verified and Targeted Explanations through Formal Methodscited by 0
  5. 2026veriFIRE: an Industrial Case Study in Verifying Consistency Properties for a DNN-Based Wildfire Detection Systemcited by 0
  6. 2026Reachability-Based Formal Verification of Graph Neural Networks with Node and Edge Featurescited by 0