GeoAgentBench: A Dynamic Execution Benchmark for Tool-Augmented Agents in Spatial Analysis
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Multimodal and embodied agents
Abstract (arXiv)
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into Geographic Information Systems (GIS) marks a paradigm shift toward autonomous spatial analysis. However, evaluating these LLM-based agents remains challenging due to the complex, multi-step nature of geospatial workflows. Existing benchmarks primarily rely on static text or code matching, neglecting dynamic runtime feedback and the multimodal nature of spatial outputs. To address this gap, we introduce GeoAgentBench (GABench), a dynamic and interactive evaluation benchmark tailored for tool-augmented GIS agents. GABench provides a realistic execution sandbox integrating 117 atomic GIS tools, encompassing 53 typical spatial analysis tasks across 6 core GIS domains. Recognizing that precise parameter configuration is the primary determinant of execution success in dynamic GIS environments, we designed the Parameter Execution Accuracy (PEA) metric, which utilizes a "Last-Attempt Alignment" strategy to quantify the fidelity of implicit parameter inference. Complementing this, a Vision-Language Model (VLM) based verification is proposed to assess data-spatial accuracy and cartographic style adherence. Furthermore, to address the frequent task failures caused by parameter misalignments and runtime anomalies, we developed a novel agent architecture, Plan-and-React, that mimics expert cognitive workflows by decoupling global orchestration from step-wise reactive execution. Extensive experiments with seven representative LLMs demonstrate that the Plan-and-React paradigm significantly outperforms traditional frameworks, achieving the optimal balance between logical rigor and execution robustness, particularly in multi-step reasoning and error recovery. Our findings highlight current capability boundaries and establish a robust standard for assessing and advancing the next generation of autonomous GeoAI.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal and embodied agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 37 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2026.
Builds on
37 of 62 references.
Closest ancestors · 9
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Designing Domain-Specific Agents via Hierarchical Task Abstraction Mechanism21 Nov
- 2025Earth-Agent: Unlocking the Full Landscape of Earth Observation with Agents27 Sep
- 2025ThinkGeo: Evaluating Tool-Augmented Agents for Remote Sensing Tasks29 May
- 2025GeoBenchX: Benchmarking LLMs in Agent Solving Multistep Geospatial Tasks23 Mar
- 2025Multi-Agent Geospatial Copilots for Remote Sensing Workflows27 Jan
- 2024GIS Copilot: Towards an Autonomous GIS Agent for Spatial Analysis5 Nov
- 2024ShapefileGPT: A Multi-Agent Large Language Model Framework for Automated Shapefile Processing16 Oct
- 2024An Autonomous GIS Agent Framework for Geospatial Data Retrieval13 Jul
- 2024MatPlotAgent: Method and Evaluation for LLM-Based Agentic Scientific Data Visualization18 Feb
Other references · 28
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,947
- 2023API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMscited by 591
- 2023Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Modelscited by 560
- 2022DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code Generationcited by 452
- 2023GeoChat: Grounded Large Vision-Language Model for Remote Sensingcited by 328
16 more
- 2024CodeAgent: Enhancing Code Generation with Tool-Integrated Agent Systems for Real-World Repo-level Coding Challengescited by 282
- 2020RSVQA: Visual Question Answering for Remote Sensing Datacited by 203
- 2023Data-Copilot: Bridging Billions of Data and Humans with Autonomous Workflowcited by 76
- 2023K2: A Foundation Language Model for Geoscience Knowledge Understanding and Utilizationcited by 69
- 2023GPT4GEO: How a Language Model Sees the World's Geographycited by 68
- 2023GeoLLM: Extracting Geospatial Knowledge from Large Language Modelscited by 64
- 2023Autonomous GIS: the next-generation AI-powered GIScited by 53
- 2025Foundation Models for Geospatial Reasoning: Assessing Capabilities of Large Language Models in Understanding Geometries and Topological Spatial Relationscited by 23
- 2024CHOICE: Benchmarking the Remote Sensing Capabilities of Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 22
- 2025GeoAnalystBench: A GeoAI benchmark for assessing large language models for spatial analysis workflow and code generationcited by 10
- 2015Geospatial Big Data Handling Theory and Methods: A Review and Research Challengescited by 9
- 2023AllSpark: A Multimodal Spatio-Temporal General Intelligence Model with Ten Modalities via Language as a Reference Frameworkcited by 6
- 2024DDFAV: Remote Sensing Large Vision Language Models Dataset and Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 5
- 2025Causal invariant geographic network representations with feature and structural distribution shiftscited by 3
- 2024Homogeneous Tokenizer Matters: Homogeneous Visual Tokenizer for Remote Sensing Image Understandingcited by 2
- 2025The Role of Open-Source LLMs in Shaping the Future of GeoAIcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026ANASSA: An Agentic AI Orchestration Framework for Spatial Intelligencecited by 1
- 2026Earth-Agent-Pro: Towards Real-World Full-Chain Earth Observation with Agentscited by 0
- 2026DUDA-Bench: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Multimodal Data-Driven Urban Diagnosiscited by 0
- 2026ANASSA: From High-Level Framework to Low-Level Architecture for Spatial Agentic AIcited by 0
- 2026Google Earth AI Geospatial Reasoning Agent: Capabilities and a Systematic Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026Google Earth AI Geospatial Reasoning Agent: Capabilities and a Systematic Evaluation11 Oct 2026
- 2026ANASSA: From High-Level Framework to Low-Level Architecture for Spatial Agentic AI9 Oct 2026
- 2026DUDA-Bench: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Multimodal Data-Driven Urban Diagnosis7 Oct 2026
- 2026ANASSA: An Agentic AI Orchestration Framework for Spatial Intelligence13 Sep 2026
- 2026Earth-Agent-Pro: Towards Real-World Full-Chain Earth Observation with Agents11 Sep 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026GISAgentBench: A Practitioner-Sourced Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Agents on GIS Tasks
- 2025MapAgent: A Hierarchical Agent for Geospatial Reasoning with Dynamic Map Tool Integration
- 2025GeoJSON Agents:A Multi-Agent LLM Architecture for Geospatial Analysis-Function Calling vs Code Generation
- 2026GeoNatureAgent (GNA): A Framework and Benchmark for Pre-Production Evaluation of Tool-Using Agents on Geospatial and Environmental Tasks
- 2026GISclaw: A Comprehensive Open-Source LLM Agent System for Realistic Multi-Step Geospatial Analysis
- 2024An LLM Agent for Automatic Geospatial Data Analysis
- 2026OpenEarthAgent: A Unified Framework for Tool-Augmented Geospatial Agents
- 2026GeoNatureAgent Benchmark: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Environmental Geospatial Analysis Across Frontier and Open-Weight Foundation Models