Causal invariant geographic network representations with feature and structural distribution shifts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The existing methods learn geographic network representations through deep graph neural networks (GNNs) based on the i.i.d. assumption. However, the spatial heterogeneity and temporal dynamics of geographic data make the out-of-distribution (OOD) generalisation problem particularly salient. The latter are particularly sensitive to distribution shifts (feature and structural shifts) between testing and training data and are the main causes of the OOD generalisation problem. Spurious correlations are present between invariant and background representations due to selection biases and environmental effects, resulting in the model extremes being more likely to learn background representations. The existing approaches focus on background representation changes that are determined by shifts in the feature distributions of nodes in the training and test data while ignoring changes in the proportional distributions of heterogeneous and homogeneous neighbour nodes, which we refer to as structural distribution shifts. We propose a feature-structure mixed invariant representation learning (FSM-IRL) model that accounts for both feature distribution shifts and structural distribution shifts. To address structural distribution shifts, we introduce a sampling method based on causal attention, encouraging the model to identify nodes possessing strong causal relationships with labels or nodes that are more similar to the target node. Inspired by the Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion, we implement a reweighting strategy to maximise the orthogonality of the node representations, thereby mitigating the spurious correlations among the node representations and suppressing the learning of background representations. Our experiments demonstrate that FSM-IRL exhibits strong learning capabilities on both geographic and social network datasets in OOD scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 52 of its 90 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2025.
Builds on
52 of 90 references.
References · 52
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
- 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,576
- 2019Simplifying Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,477
- 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Augmentationscited by 1,208
- 2016Deep CORAL: Correlation Alignment for Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 1,200
38 more
- 2016Revisiting Semi-Supervised Learning with Graph Embeddingscited by 976
- 2021Generalizing to Unseen Domains: A Survey on Domain Generalizationcited by 766
- 2021Domain Generalization: A Surveycited by 764
- 2018FastGCN: Fast Learning with Graph Convolutional Networks via Importance Samplingcited by 584
- 2015Optimal Transport for Domain Adaptationcited by 463
- 2021Towards Out-Of-Distribution Generalization: A Surveycited by 436
- 2020Data Augmentation for Graph Neural Networkscited by 203
- 2019A Meta-Transfer Objective for Learning to Disentangle Causal Mechanismscited by 158
- 2022Learning Causally Invariant Representations for Out-of-Distribution Generalization on Graphscited by 144
- 2022GOOD: A Graph Out-of-Distribution Benchmarkcited by 141
- 2021Generative Causal Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 124
- 2021AdaRNN: Adaptive Learning and Forecasting of Time Seriescited by 121
- 2022A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthy Graph Neural Networks: Privacy, Robustness, Fairness, and Explainabilitycited by 118
- 2016OSMnx: New Methods for Acquiring, Constructing, Analyzing, and Visualizing Complex Street Networkscited by 110
- 2021Causal Attention for Interpretable and Generalizable Graph Classificationcited by 108
- 2022Out-Of-Distribution Generalization on Graphs: A Surveycited by 97
- 2021OoD-Bench: Quantifying and Understanding Two Dimensions of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 86
- 2021Size-Invariant Graph Representations for Graph Classification Extrapolationscited by 84
- 2021OOD-GNN: Out-of-Distribution Generalized Graph Neural Networkcited by 78
- 2021Generalizing Graph Neural Networks on Out-Of-Distribution Graphscited by 71
- 2019Stable Learning via Sample Reweightingcited by 70
- 2021Learning from Counterfactual Links for Link Predictioncited by 69
- 2020Robust Optimization as Data Augmentation for Large-scale Graphscited by 58
- 2022Let Invariant Rationale Discovery Inspire Graph Contrastive Learningcited by 57
- 2021Local Augmentation for Graph Neural Networkscited by 53
- 2022From Statistical to Causal Learningcited by 40
- 2019Independence Promoted Graph Disentangled Networkscited by 38
- 2022OOD Link Prediction Generalization Capabilities of Message-Passing GNNs in Larger Test Graphscited by 38
- 2022SizeShiftReg: a Regularization Method for Improving Size-Generalization in Graph Neural Networkscited by 37
- 2024Alleviating Structural Distribution Shift in Graph Anomaly Detectioncited by 32
- 2020Multiscale Dynamic Human Mobility Flow Dataset in the U.S. during the COVID-19 Epidemiccited by 28
- 2022Debiased Graph Neural Networks with Agnostic Label Selection Biascited by 25
- 2020Interpretable Deep Graph Generation with Node-Edge Co-Disentanglementcited by 24
- 2023Towards Fair Graph Neural Networks via Graph Counterfactualcited by 23
- 2021CAP: Co-Adversarial Perturbation on Weights and Features for Improving Generalization of Graph Neural Networkscited by 15
- 2023Shift-Robust Molecular Relational Learning with Causal Substructurecited by 15
- 2019Causal bootstrappingcited by 11
- 2024Learning Invariant Representations of Graph Neural Networks via Cluster Generalizationcited by 10
50 most cited of 52 All 52 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.