mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beyond State Consistency: Behavior Consistency in Text-Based World Models

arXiv 2604.13824 ↗First posted 15 Apr 2026cs.LGcited by 5

On the map: World models → World models for language agents

Abstract (arXiv)

World models have been emerging as critical components for assessing the consequences of actions generated by interactive agents in online planning and offline evaluation. In text-based environments, world models are typically evaluated and trained with single-step metrics such as Exact Match, aiming to improve the similarity between predicted and real-world states, but such metrics have been shown to be insufficient for capturing actual agent behavior. To address this issue, we introduce a new behavior-aligned training paradigm aimed at improving the functional consistency between the world model and the real environment. This paradigm focuses on optimizing a tractable step-level metric named Behavior Consistency Reward (BehR), which measures how much the likelihood of a logged next action changes between the real state and the world-model-predicted state under a frozen Reference Agent. Experiments on WebShop and TextWorld show that BehR-based training improves long-term alignment in several settings, with the clearest gains in WebShop and less movement in near-ceiling regimes, while preserving or improving single-step prediction quality in three of four settings. World models trained with BehR also achieve lower false positives in offline surrogate evaluation and show modest but encouraging gains in inference-time lookahead planning.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in World models for language agents, one of 11 directions in World models. Builds on 16 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2026.

Builds on

16 of 24 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025WebEvolver: Enhancing Web Agent Self-Improvement with Coevolving World Model23 Apr
  2. 2024Web Agents with World Models: Learning and Leveraging Environment Dynamics in Web Navigation17 Oct

Other references · 14

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  3. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  5. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  6. 2019Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imaginationcited by 1,653
  7. 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,353
  8. 2022WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language Agentscited by 1,251
  9. 2018TextWorld: A Learning Environment for Text-based Gamescited by 310
  10. 2024AgentGym: Evolving Large Language Model-based Agents across Diverse Environmentscited by 120
  11. 2023SteP: Stacked LLM Policies for Web Actionscited by 66
  12. 2024Can Language Models Serve as Text-Based World Simulators?cited by 52
2 more
  1. 2025RLVR-World: Training World Models with Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
  2. 2026Computer-Using World Modelcited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025R-WoM: Retrieval-augmented World Model For Computer-use Agents
  2. 2025From Word to World: Can Large Language Models be Implicit Text-based World Models?
  3. 2026Beyond Prediction: Steering VLM Agents with Retrospective World Modeling
  4. 2026CoMAP: Co-Evolving World Models and Agent Policies for LLM Agents
  5. 2026Is the Future Compatible? Diagnosing Dynamic Consistency in World Action Models
  6. 2026How do World Models and Policies Compose in LLM Agents? A Joint Spectral and Behavioral Account
  7. 2026Measuring Cross-Task Behavioral Consistency in Language Model Agents
  8. 2026Aligning Agents via Planning: A Benchmark for Trajectory-Level Reward Modeling