mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SOAR: Self-Correction for Optimal Alignment and Refinement in Diffusion Models

arXiv 2604.12617 ↗First posted 14 Apr 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 6

On the map: Diffusion models → Diffusion and flow policies for robotics

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

The post-training pipeline for diffusion models currently has two stages: supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on curated data and reinforcement learning (RL) with reward models. A fundamental gap separates them. SFT optimizes the denoiser only on ground-truth states sampled from the forward noising process; once inference deviates from these ideal states, subsequent denoising relies on out-of-distribution generalization rather than learned correction, exhibiting the same exposure bias that afflicts autoregressive models, but accumulated along the denoising trajectory instead of the token sequence. RL can in principle address this mismatch, yet its terminal reward signal is sparse, suffers from credit-assignment difficulty, and risks reward hacking. We propose SOAR (Self-Correction for Optimal Alignment and Refinement), a bias-correction post-training method that fills this gap. Starting from a real sample, SOAR performs a single stop-gradient rollout with the current model, re-noises the resulting off-trajectory state, and supervises the model to steer back toward the original clean target. The method is on-policy, reward-free, and provides dense per-timestep supervision with no credit-assignment problem. On SD3.5-Medium, SOAR improves GenEval from 0.70 to 0.78 and OCR from 0.64 to 0.67 over SFT, while simultaneously raising all model-based preference scores. In controlled reward-specific experiments, SOAR surpasses Flow-GRPO in final metric value on both aesthetic and text-image alignment tasks, despite having no access to a reward model. Since SOAR's base loss subsumes the standard SFT objective, it can directly replace SFT as a stronger first post-training stage after pretraining, while remaining fully compatible with subsequent RL alignment.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion and flow policies for robotics, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 28 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2026.

Builds on

28 of 31 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025DiffusionNFT: Online Diffusion Reinforcement with Forward Process19 Sep
  2. 2025Flow-GRPO: Training Flow Matching Models via Online RL8 May
  3. 2023Diffusion Model Alignment Using Direct Preference Optimization21 Nov
  4. 2023Human Preference Score: Better Aligning Text-to-Image Models with Human Preference25 Mar

Other references · 24

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  2. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  3. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 8,964
  4. 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,322
  5. 2022Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformerscited by 5,931
  6. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
  7. 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,290
  8. 2024Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,094
  9. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,550
  10. 2024HunyuanVideo: A Systematic Framework For Large Video Generative Modelscited by 1,597
  11. 2023ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 1,010
  12. 2023Human Preference Score v2: A Solid Benchmark for Evaluating Human Preferences of Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 847
12 more
  1. 2015Scheduled Sampling for Sequence Prediction with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 779
  2. 2024Mastering Text-to-Image Diffusion: Recaptioning, Planning, and Generating with Multimodal LLMscited by 224
  3. 2022Optimizing Prompts for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 204
  4. 2025T2I-R1: Reinforcing Image Generation with Collaborative Semantic-level and Token-level CoTcited by 162
  5. 2023Self-correcting LLM-controlled Diffusion Modelscited by 112
  6. 2023Elucidating the Exposure Bias in Diffusion Modelscited by 98
  7. 2023Input Perturbation Reduces Exposure Bias in Diffusion Modelscited by 88
  8. 2024Improving Text-to-Image Consistency via Automatic Prompt Optimizationcited by 88
  9. 2025SimpleAR: Pushing the Frontier of Autoregressive Visual Generation through Pretraining, SFT, and RLcited by 85
  10. 2024Dynamic Prompt Optimizing for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 45
  11. 2025PromptEnhancer: A Simple Approach to Enhance Text-to-Image Models via Chain-of-Thought Prompt Rewritingcited by 38
  12. 2025RePrompt: Reasoning-Augmented Reprompting for Text-to-Image Generation via Reinforcement Learningcited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Do Less, Achieve More: Do We Need Every-Step Optimization for RL Fine-tuning of Diffusion Models?
  2. 2026Step-level Denoising-time Diffusion Alignment with Multiple Objectives
  3. 2026On-Policy Self-Distillation in Diffusion Models
  4. 2025ShortFT: Diffusion Model Alignment via Shortcut-based Fine-Tuning
  5. 2026Latent Reward Registers for Diffusion Preference Alignment
  6. 2026Explore or Converge? Stage-Guided Per-Step Optimization for Diffusion Models
  7. 2026Diffusion Alignment Beyond KL: Variance Minimisation as Effective Policy Optimiser
  8. 2024Avoiding mode collapse in diffusion models fine-tuned with reinforcement learning