mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Explore or Converge? Stage-Guided Per-Step Optimization for Diffusion Models

arXiv 2608.06768 ↗First posted 7 Aug 2026cs.CVcited by 1

On the map: Diffusion models → Diffusion and flow policies for robotics

Abstract (arXiv)

Diffusion models have strong generative capabilities. However, their maximum likelihood training objective only focuses on reconstructing the data distribution, making it difficult to align with specific preferences. Reinforcement learning (RL) for preference alignment in diffusion models is promising but limited by reward sparsity. Since a single reward cannot support optimization, existing RL methods usually backpropagate the final reward to all previous steps. However, denoising is stage-wise, with distinct semantics and controllability. Repeating the final reward across all steps creates a temporal objective mismatch, encouraging reward shortcuts that lead to reward hacking. At the same time, due to reward backfilling, each time step receives the same reward, making it impossible to distinguish between actions, thereby weakening the optimization process. To resolve this issue, we propose Stage-Guided Per-Step Optimization (SGPO) for diffusion models, which jointly leverages signal-to-noise ratio and semantic changes to identify generation stages and adaptively assign stage-specific objectives. Early denoising is chaotic and far from the final reward, resulting in weak reward-behavior correlation. This stage should prioritize exiting the chaotic state. In the mid stage, the latent transitions to a stable structure, where the final reward better corresponds to generative behavior. Therefore, this stage optimizes the final reward while exploring diversity to avoid early convergence to a single mode. In the late stage, the latent's core structure is largely fixed, and preference optimization mainly amplifies local details, risking overfitting. Therefore, stable convergence is preferred to avoid quality degradation. Results from 16 comparative experiments validate SGPO. Our method achieves 26.7% average gains in generative quality and 36.7% higher convergence speed.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion and flow policies for robotics, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 28 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2026.

Builds on

28 of 50 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025MIRA: Towards Mitigating Reward Hacking in Inference-Time Alignment of T2I Diffusion Models2 Oct
  2. 2025Steering Your Diffusion Policy with Latent Space Reinforcement Learning18 Jun
  3. 2025Alignment and Safety of Diffusion Models via Reinforcement Learning and Reward Modeling: A Survey23 May
  4. 2025DRAGON: Distributional Rewards Optimize Diffusion Generative Models21 Apr
  5. 2024DyMO: Training-Free Diffusion Model Alignment with Dynamic Multi-Objective Scheduling1 Dec
  6. 2023Using Human Feedback to Fine-tune Diffusion Models without Any Reward Model22 Nov
  7. 2023Training Diffusion Models with Reinforcement Learning22 May

Other references · 21

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  3. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  4. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
  5. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,970
  6. 2023Pick-a-Pic: An Open Dataset of User Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 977
  7. 2023GenEval: An Object-Focused Framework for Evaluating Text-to-Image Alignmentcited by 972
  8. 2019Improved Precision and Recall Metric for Assessing Generative Modelscited by 944
  9. 2022Perception Prioritized Training of Diffusion Modelscited by 303
  10. 2017Inverse Reward Designcited by 249
  11. 2023Helping or Herding? Reward Model Ensembles Mitigate but do not Eliminate Reward Hackingcited by 200
  12. 2024Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization in Direct Alignment Algorithmscited by 143
9 more
  1. 2024RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMscited by 90
  2. 2024Dense Reward for Free in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 78
  3. 2023AutoDiffusion: Training-Free Optimization of Time Steps and Architectures for Automated Diffusion Model Accelerationcited by 70
  4. 2024Correlated Proxies: A New Definition and Improved Mitigation for Reward Hackingcited by 50
  5. 2024Towards Understanding the Working Mechanism of Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelcited by 48
  6. 2025SliderSpace: Decomposing the Visual Capabilities of Diffusion Modelscited by 26
  7. 2024Measuring Diversity in Co-creative Image Generationcited by 15
  8. 2024The Evolution of Reinforcement Learning in Quantitative Finance: A Surveycited by 11
  9. 2024The Exploration-Exploitation Dilemma Revisited: An Entropy Perspectivecited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025CoCA: Step-level Reward for Free in RL-based T2I Diffusion Model Fine-tuning
  2. 2023Towards Controllable Diffusion Models via Reward-Guided Exploration
  3. 2026Step-level Denoising-time Diffusion Alignment with Multiple Objectives
  4. 2024Avoiding mode collapse in diffusion models fine-tuned with reinforcement learning
  5. 2025Test-time Alignment of Diffusion Models without Reward Over-optimization
  6. 2026Reinforcement Learning for Diffusion LLMs with Entropy-Guided Step Selection and Stepwise Advantages
  7. 2025Inference-Time Alignment Control for Diffusion Models with Reinforcement Learning Guidance
  8. 2024Aligning Few-Step Diffusion Models with Dense Reward Difference Learning