mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Do Vision Language Models Need to Process Image Tokens?

arXiv 2604.09425 ↗First posted 10 Apr 2026cs.CVcited by 1

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Visual token pruning and efficiency

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision Language Models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable success by integrating visual encoders with large language models (LLMs). While VLMs process dense image tokens across deep transformer stacks (incurring substantial computational overhead), it remains fundamentally unclear whether sustained image-token processing is necessary for their performance or visual representations meaningfully evolve from early to later layers. In this work, we systematically investigate the functional role of image tokens in VLMs and show that visual representations rapidly converge to a bounded-complexity regime, ie their entropy stabilizes, intrinsic dimensionality compresses, and trajectory curvature approaches a near-constant profile. In contrast, textual representations continue to undergo substantial restructuring across depth. Once stabilized, visual representations become largely interchangeable between layers, indicating limited additional transformation in deeper stages. Further, depth-wise visual truncation reveals that the necessity of visual processing is task-dependent, where single-token predictions remain comparatively robust to truncated visual depth, but multi-token generation require sustained access to visual representations. Under deterministic decoding, reducing visual depth perturbs intermediate reasoning trajectories more strongly than final outputs, suggesting that image tokens influence the structure of reasoning more than the ultimate conclusions. Collectively, these findings question the assumption that deeper visual processing is uniformly essential in VLMs, challenging the current paradigm of multimodal LLM architectures.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 23 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2026.

Builds on

23 of 32 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025SCOPE: Saliency-Coverage Oriented Token Pruning for Efficient Multimodel LLMs28 Oct
  2. 2025FlowCut: Rethinking Redundancy via Information Flow for Efficient Vision-Language Models26 May
  3. 2025ShortV: Efficient Multimodal Large Language Models by Freezing Visual Tokens in Ineffective Layers1 Apr
  4. 2024Pruning All-Rounder: Rethinking and Improving Inference Efficiency for Large Vision Language Models9 Dec
  5. 2024SparseVLM: Visual Token Sparsification for Efficient Vision-Language Model Inference6 Oct
  6. 2024Fit and Prune: Fast and Training-free Visual Token Pruning for Multi-modal Large Language Models16 Sep
  7. 2024Boosting Multimodal Large Language Models with Visual Tokens Withdrawal for Rapid Inference9 May
  8. 2024An Image is Worth 1/2 Tokens After Layer 2: Plug-and-Play Inference Acceleration for Large Vision-Language Models11 Mar

Other references · 15

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
  3. 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,769
  4. 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,449
  5. 2022Token Merging: Your ViT But Fastercited by 995
  6. 2021DynamicViT: Efficient Vision Transformers with Dynamic Token Sparsificationcited by 849
  7. 2024BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceivecited by 529
  8. 2025Layer by Layer: Uncovering Hidden Representations in Language Modelscited by 293
  9. 2024Vision language models are blind: Failing to translate detailed visual features into wordscited by 144
  10. 2024M3CoT: A Novel Benchmark for Multi-Domain Multi-step Multi-modal Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 120
  11. 2025Words or Vision: Do Vision-Language Models Have Blind Faith in Text?cited by 86
  12. 2025Vision Function Layer in Multimodal LLMscited by 17
3 more
  1. 2025EGOILLUSION: Benchmarking Hallucinations in Egocentric Video Understandingcited by 10
  2. 2023Analyzing the Efficacy of an LLM-Only Approach for Image-based Document Question Answeringcited by 7
  3. 2025Rethinking Explainability in the Era of Multimodal AIcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025VScan: Rethinking Visual Token Reduction for Efficient Large Vision-Language Models
  2. 2024Towards Interpreting Visual Information Processing in Vision-Language Models
  3. 2026What Do Visual Tokens Really Encode? Uncovering Sparsity and Redundancy in Multimodal Large Language Models
  4. 2025HERO: Rethinking Visual Token Early Dropping in High-Resolution Large Vision-Language Models
  5. 2025TokenFLEX: Unified VLM Training for Flexible Visual Tokens Inference
  6. 2024Inference Optimal VLMs Need Fewer Visual Tokens and More Parameters
  7. 2025Visual Representations inside the Language Model
  8. 2026Efficient Inference for Large Vision-Language Models: Bottlenecks, Techniques, and Prospects