mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Analyzing the Efficacy of an LLM-Only Approach for Image-based Document Question Answering

arXiv 2309.14389 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2023cs.CV cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent document question answering models consist of two key components: the vision encoder, which captures layout and visual elements in images, and a Large Language Model (LLM) that helps contextualize questions to the image and supplements them with external world knowledge to generate accurate answers. However, the relative contributions of the vision encoder and the language model in these tasks remain unclear. This is especially interesting given the effectiveness of instruction-tuned LLMs, which exhibit remarkable adaptability to new tasks. To this end, we explore the following aspects in this work: (1) The efficacy of an LLM-only approach on document question answering tasks (2) strategies for serializing textual information within document images and feeding it directly to an instruction-tuned LLM, thus bypassing the need for an explicit vision encoder (3) thorough quantitative analysis on the feasibility of such an approach. Our comprehensive analysis encompasses six diverse benchmark datasets, utilizing LLMs of varying scales. Our findings reveal that a strategy exclusively reliant on the LLM yields results that are on par with or closely approach state-of-the-art performance across a range of datasets. We posit that this evaluation framework will serve as a guiding resource for selecting appropriate datasets for future research endeavors that emphasize the fundamental importance of layout and image content information.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2023.

Builds on

26 of 32 references.

References · 26

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  4. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  5. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
  6. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
  7. 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,718
  8. 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,479
  9. 2020DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Imagescited by 1,317
  10. 2016A Diagram Is Worth A Dozen Imagescited by 804
  11. 2022PaLI: A Jointly-Scaled Multilingual Language-Image Modelcited by 766
  12. 2022LayoutLMv3: Pre-training for Document AI with Unified Text and Image Maskingcited by 485
14 more
  1. 2021InfographicVQAcited by 437
  2. 2022Pix2Struct: Screenshot Parsing as Pretraining for Visual Language Understandingcited by 366
  3. 2021TrOCR: Transformer-based Optical Character Recognition with Pre-trained Modelscited by 279
  4. 2021DocFormer: End-to-End Transformer for Document Understandingcited by 256
  5. 2022Scaling Up Models and Data with textttt5x and textttseqiocited by 187
  6. 2022Unifying Vision, Text, and Layout for Universal Document Processingcited by 140
  7. 2022MatCha: Enhancing Visual Language Pretraining with Math Reasoning and Chart Derenderingcited by 133
  8. 2019Iterative Answer Prediction with Pointer-Augmented Multimodal Transformers for TextVQAcited by 107
  9. 2021LayoutReader: Pre-training of Text and Layout for Reading Order Detectioncited by 80
  10. 2021LaTr: Layout-Aware Transformer for Scene-Text VQAcited by 72
  11. 2022FormNet: Structural Encoding beyond Sequential Modeling in Form Document Information Extractioncited by 64
  12. 2019ICDAR 2019 Competition on Scene Text Visual Question Answeringcited by 46
  13. 2021Rethinking Text Line Recognition Modelscited by 45
  14. 2023Text Reading Order in Uncontrolled Conditions by Sparse Graph Segmentationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

7 papers.