mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

What Do Visual Tokens Really Encode? Uncovering Sparsity and Redundancy in Multimodal Large Language Models

arXiv 2603.00510 ↗First posted 28 Feb 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 5

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Visual token pruning and efficiency

Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) project visual tokens into the embedding space of language models, yet the internal structuring and processing of visual semantics remain poorly understood. In this work, we introduce a two-fold analytical framework featuring a novel probing tool, EmbedLens, to conduct a fine-grained analysis. We uncover a pronounced semantic sparsity at the input level: visual tokens consistently partition into sink, dead, and alive categories. Remarkably, only the alive tokens, comprising ≈60% of the total input, carry image-specific meaning. Furthermore, using a targeted patch-compression benchmark, we demonstrate that these alive tokens already encode rich, fine-grained cues (e.g., objects, colors, and OCR) prior to entering the LLM. Internal visual computations (such as visual attention and feed-forward networks) are redundant for most standard tasks. For the small subset of highly vision-centric tasks that actually benefit from internal processing, we reveal that alive tokens naturally align with intermediate LLM layers rather than the initial embedding space, indicating that shallow-layer processing is unnecessary and that direct mid-layer injection is both sufficient. Ultimately, our findings provide a unified mechanistic view of visual token processing, paving the way for more efficient and interpretable MLLM architectures through selective token pruning, minimized visual computation, and mid-layer injection. The code is released at: https://github.com/EIT-NLP/EmbedLens.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 38 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2026.

Builds on

38 of 54 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026ViCA: Efficient Multimodal LLMs with Vision-Only Cross-Attention7 Feb
  2. 2025Can Visual Input Be Compressed? A Visual Token Compression Benchmark for Large Multimodal Models4 Nov
  3. 2025To Sink or Not to Sink: Visual Information Pathways in Large Vision-Language Models9 Oct
  4. 2025Are We Using the Right Benchmark: An Evaluation Framework for Visual Token Compression Methods8 Oct
  5. 2025HiPrune: Hierarchical Attention for Efficient Token Pruning in Vision-Language Models1 Aug
  6. 2025See What You Are Told: Visual Attention Sink in Large Multimodal Models5 Mar
  7. 2025Token Pruning in Multimodal Large Language Models: Are We Solving the Right Problem?17 Feb
  8. 2024Efficient Large Multi-modal Models via Visual Context Compression28 Jun

Other references · 30

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
  3. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,418
  4. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
  5. 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,337
  6. 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,115
  7. 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,105
  8. 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,769
  9. 2023Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,696
  10. 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 1,624
  11. 2023A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 898
  12. 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?cited by 893
18 more
  1. 2023OCRBench: On the Hidden Mystery of OCR in Large Multimodal Modelscited by 466
  2. 2024ShortGPT: Layers in Large Language Models are More Redundant Than You Expectcited by 369
  3. 2024The Platonic Representation Hypothesiscited by 362
  4. 2024When Attention Sink Emerges in Language Models: An Empirical Viewcited by 200
  5. 2024Towards Interpreting Visual Information Processing in Vision-Language Modelscited by 115
  6. 2024The Semantic Hub Hypothesis: Language Models Share Semantic Representations Across Languages and Modalitiescited by 69
  7. 2025Do Language Models Use Their Depth Efficiently?cited by 48
  8. 2024Do Vision and Language Encoders Represent the World Similarly?cited by 44
  9. 2025LLMs are Single-threaded Reasoners: Demystifying the Working Mechanism of Soft Thinkingcited by 34
  10. 2025How Visual Representations Map to Language Feature Space in Multimodal LLMscited by 24
  11. 2025Learning to See Before Seeing: Demystifying LLM Visual Priors from Language Pre-trainingcited by 23
  12. 2025Multimodal Language Models See Better When They Look Shallowercited by 22
  13. 2024To Preserve or To Compress: An In-Depth Study of Connector Selection in Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 10
  14. 2025Towards Understanding How Knowledge Evolves in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 10
  15. 2025LLM as Effective Streaming Processor: Bridging Streaming-Batch Mismatches with Group Position Encodingcited by 9
  16. 2025Prune&Comp: Free Lunch for Layer-Pruned LLMs via Iterative Pruning with Magnitude Compensationcited by 5
  17. 2025LLaSO: A Foundational Framework for Reproducible Research in Large Language and Speech Modelcited by 3
  18. 2026Rethinking the Role of LLMs in Time Series Forecastingcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Do Vision Language Models Need to Process Image Tokens?
  2. 2024Treat Visual Tokens as Text? But Your MLLM Only Needs Fewer Efforts to See
  3. 2025VScan: Rethinking Visual Token Reduction for Efficient Large Vision-Language Models
  4. 2025Token Sequence Compression for Efficient Multimodal Computing
  5. 2026How Many Visual Tokens Do Multimodal Language Models Need? Scaling Visual Token Pruning with F^3A
  6. 2024Boosting Multimodal Large Language Models with Visual Tokens Withdrawal for Rapid Inference
  7. 2025Beyond Intermediate States: Explaining Visual Redundancy through Language
  8. 2025Unified Multimodal Understanding via Byte-Pair Visual Encoding