mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Neural-Symbolic Knowledge Tracing: Injecting Educational Knowledge into Deep Learning for Responsible Learner Modelling

arXiv 2604.08263 ↗First posted 9 Apr 2026cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in education, particularly large language models (LLMs), has increased interest in intelligent tutoring systems. However, LLMs often show limited adaptivity and struggle to model learners' evolving knowledge over time, highlighting the need for dedicated learner modelling approaches. Although deep knowledge tracing methods achieve strong predictive performance, their opacity and susceptibility to bias can limit alignment with pedagogical principles. To address this, we propose Responsible-DKT, a neural-symbolic deep knowledge tracing approach that integrates symbolic educational knowledge (e.g., mastery and non-mastery rules) into sequential neural models for responsible learner modelling. Experiments on a real-world dataset of students' math interactions show that Responsible-DKT outperforms both a neural-symbolic baseline and a fully data-driven PyTorch DKT model across training settings. The model achieves over 0.80 AUC with only 10% of training data and up to 0.90 AUC, improving performance by up to 13%. It also demonstrates improved temporal reliability, producing lower early- and mid-sequence prediction errors and the lowest prediction inconsistency rates across sequence lengths, indicating that prediction updates remain directionally aligned with observed student responses over time. Furthermore, the neural-symbolic approach offers intrinsic interpretability via a grounded computation graph that exposes the logic behind each prediction, enabling both local and global explanations. It also allows empirical evaluation of pedagogical assumptions, revealing that repeated incorrect responses (non-mastery) strongly influence prediction updates. These results indicate that neural-symbolic approaches enhance both performance and interpretability, mitigate data limitations, and support more responsible, human-centered AI in education.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 110 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2026.

Builds on

43 of 110 references.

References · 43

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
  3. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  4. 2014Neural Turing Machinescited by 630
  5. 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 440
  6. 2020Understanding the Behaviour of Contrastive Losscited by 397
  7. 2019The Neuro-Symbolic Concept Learner: Interpreting Scenes, Words, and Sentences From Natural Supervisioncited by 369
  8. 2015Deep Knowledge Tracingcited by 328
  9. 2019Deep Learning for Symbolic Mathematicscited by 266
  10. 2020Neurosymbolic AI: The 3rd Wavecited by 253
  11. 2017Neural-Symbolic Learning and Reasoning: A Survey and Interpretationcited by 195
  12. 2020Context-Aware Attentive Knowledge Tracingcited by 172
31 more
  1. 2016Dynamic Key-Value Memory Networks for Knowledge Tracingcited by 170
  2. 2019A Self-Attentive model for Knowledge Tracingcited by 169
  3. 2019EKT: Exercise-aware Knowledge Tracing for Student Performance Predictioncited by 109
  4. 2020Towards an Appropriate Query, Key, and Value Computation for Knowledge Tracingcited by 79
  5. 2022Knowledge Tracing: A Surveycited by 76
  6. 2019Knowledge Tracing with Sequential Key-Value Memory Networkscited by 60
  7. 2024Unifying AI Tutor Evaluation: An Evaluation Taxonomy for Pedagogical Ability Assessment of LLM-Powered AI Tutorscited by 60
  8. 2018Addressing Two Problems in Deep Knowledge Tracing via Prediction-Consistent Regularizationcited by 53
  9. 2020GIKT: A Graph-based Interaction Model for Knowledge Tracingcited by 51
  10. 2022How Different Groups Prioritize Ethical Values for Responsible AIcited by 49
  11. 2025Is Chain-of-Thought Reasoning of LLMs a Mirage? A Data Distribution Lenscited by 42
  12. 2024Evaluating the Effectiveness of LLMs in Introductory Computer Science Education: A Semester-Long Field Studycited by 26
  13. 2024Large Language Models are Biased Because They Are Large Language Modelscited by 26
  14. 2018Deep Knowledge Tracing and Dynamic Student Classification for Knowledge Tracingcited by 23
  15. 2025LLM-powered Multi-agent Framework for Goal-oriented Learning in Intelligent Tutoring Systemcited by 21
  16. 2019QuesNet: A Unified Representation for Heterogeneous Test Questionscited by 18
  17. 2021Deep Graph Memory Networks for Forgetting-Robust Knowledge Tracingcited by 17
  18. 2024Promises and challenges of generative artificial intelligence for human learningcited by 17
  19. 2025Can Large Language Models Match Tutoring System Adaptivity? A Benchmarking Studycited by 17
  20. 2020Logistic Knowledge Tracing: A Constrained Framework for Learner Modelingcited by 15
  21. 2024Leveraging LLM Tutoring Systems for Non-Native English Speakers in Introductory CS Coursescited by 8
  22. 2024A Survey of Explainable Knowledge Tracingcited by 7
  23. 2024The Ethics of AI in Educationcited by 7
  24. 2024Responsible Artificial Intelligence: A Structured Literature Reviewcited by 6
  25. 2022Towards Responsible AI for Financial Transactionscited by 5
  26. 2025Benchmarking Educational LLMs with Analytics: A Case Study on Gender Bias in Feedbackcited by 5
  27. 2025Towards Reliable Generative AI-Driven Scaffolding: Reducing Hallucinations and Enhancing Quality in Self-Regulated Learning Supportcited by 4
  28. 2025Towards Responsible and Trustworthy Educational Data Mining: Comparing Symbolic, Sub-Symbolic, and Neural-Symbolic AI Methodscited by 3
  29. 2025Towards responsible AI for education: Hybrid human-AI to confront the Elephant in the roomcited by 3
  30. 2025Problems With Large Language Models for Learner Modelling: Why LLMs Alone Fall Short for Responsible Tutoring in K--12 Educationcited by 2
  31. 2026Protecting and Promoting Human Agency in Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligencecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.