mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Flaws of ImageNet, Computer Vision's Favourite Dataset

arXiv 2412.00076 ↗First posted 26 Nov 2024cs.CVcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Since its release, ImageNet-1k dataset has become a gold standard for evaluating model performance. It has served as the foundation for numerous other datasets and training tasks in computer vision. As models have improved in accuracy, issues related to label correctness have become increasingly apparent. In this blog post, we analyze the issues in the ImageNet-1k dataset, including incorrect labels, overlapping or ambiguous class definitions, training-evaluation domain shifts, and image duplicates. The solutions for some problems are straightforward. For others, we hope to start a broader conversation about refining this influential dataset to better serve future research.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 6 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2024.

Builds on

6 of 6 references.

References · 6

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  3. 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,304
  4. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
  5. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
  6. 2022Bugs in the Data: How ImageNet Misrepresents Biodiversitycited by 24

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 6.

12 papers.