mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Your Agent, Their Asset: A Real-World Safety Analysis of OpenClaw

arXiv 2604.04759 ↗First posted 6 Apr 2026cs.CR cs.AI cs.CLcited by 19

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

OpenClaw, the most widely deployed personal AI agent in early 2026, operates with full local system access and integrates with sensitive services such as Gmail, Stripe, and the filesystem. While these broad privileges enable high levels of automation and powerful personalization, they also expose a substantial attack surface that existing sandboxed evaluations fail to capture. To address this gap, we present the first real-world safety evaluation of OpenClaw and introduce the CIK taxonomy, which unifies an agent's persistent state into three dimensions, i.e., Capability, Identity, and Knowledge, for safety analysis. Our evaluations cover 12 attack scenarios on a live OpenClaw instance across four backbone models (Claude Sonnet 4.5, Opus 4.6, Gemini 3.1 Pro, and GPT-5.4). The results show that poisoning any single CIK dimension increases the average attack success rate from 24.6% to 64-74%, with even the most robust model exhibiting more than a threefold increase over its baseline vulnerability. We further assess three CIK-aligned defense strategies alongside a file-protection mechanism; however, the strongest defense still yields a 63.8% success rate under Capability-targeted attacks, while file protection blocks 97% of malicious injections but also prevents legitimate updates. Taken together, these findings show that the vulnerabilities are inherent to the agent architecture, necessitating more systematic safeguards to secure personal AI agents. Our project page is https://ucsc-vlaa.github.io/CIK-Bench.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 22 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2026.

Builds on

22 of 34 references.

Closest ancestors · 13

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Zombie Agents: Persistent Control of Self-Evolving LLM Agents via Self-Reinforcing Injections17 Feb
  2. 2026Agent Skills in the Wild: An Empirical Study of Security Vulnerabilities at Scale15 Jan
  3. 2025Your Agent May Misevolve: Emergent Risks in Self-evolving LLM Agents30 Sep
  4. 2025"Your AI, My Shell": Demystifying Prompt Injection Attacks on Agentic AI Coding Editors26 Sep
  5. 2025MCPTox: A Benchmark for Tool Poisoning Attack on Real-World MCP Servers19 Aug
  6. 2025OpenAgentSafety: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Real-World AI Agent Safety8 Jul
  7. 2025Memory Injection Attacks on LLM Agents via Query-Only Interaction5 Mar
  8. 2024Refusal-Trained LLMs Are Easily Jailbroken As Browser Agents11 Oct
  9. 2024AgentHarm: A Benchmark for Measuring Harmfulness of LLM Agents11 Oct
  10. 2024Agent Security Bench (ASB): Formalizing and Benchmarking Attacks and Defenses in LLM-based Agents3 Oct
  11. 2024AgentPoison: Red-teaming LLM Agents via Poisoning Memory or Knowledge Bases17 Jul
  12. 2024InjecAgent: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injections in Tool-Integrated Large Language Model Agents5 Mar
1 more
  1. 2023Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated Sandbox25 Sep

Other references · 9

  1. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
  2. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
  3. 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,081
  4. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
  5. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,339
  6. 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,295
  7. 2024Great, Now Write an Article About That: The Crescendo Multi-Turn LLM Jailbreak Attackcited by 364
  8. 2024PoisonedRAG: Knowledge Corruption Attacks to Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Modelscited by 251
  9. 2025Alignment Tipping Process: How Self-Evolution Pushes LLM Agents Off the Railscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 19.

19 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2026AgentTrap: Measuring Runtime Trust Failures in Third-Party Agent Skillscited by 9
  2. 2026Auditing Agent Harness Safetycited by 8
  3. 2026Towards Security-Auditable LLM Agents: A Unified Graph Representationcited by 4
  4. 2026OpenSkillRisk: Benchmarking Agent Safety When Using Real-World Risky Third-Party Skillscited by 3
  5. 2026Red-Teaming Agent Execution Contexts: Open-World Security Evaluation on OpenClawcited by 2
  6. 2026SentGuard: Sentence-Level Streaming Guardrails for Large Language Modelscited by 2
  7. 2026Runtime Skill Audit: Targeted Runtime Probing for Agent Skill Securitycited by 2
  8. 2026Stateful Agent Backdoorcited by 1
  9. 2026Constraining Host-Level Abuse in Self-Hosted Computer-Use Agents via TEE-Backed Isolationcited by 1
  10. 2026When Routine Chats Turn Toxic: Unintended Long-Term State Poisoning in Personalized Agentscited by 1
  11. 2026Security of OpenClaw Agents: Fundamentals, Attacks, and Countermeasurescited by 1
  12. 2026Triaging Threats to Specialized Guardrailscited by 1
7 more
  1. 2026Securing Computer-Use Agents: A Unified Architecture-Lifecycle Framework for Deployment-Grounded Reliabilitycited by 0
  2. 2026Understanding and mitigating the risks of OpenClaw for non-technical users: A practical guide with Skillcited by 0
  3. 2026Token-Flow Firewall: Semantic Runtime Auditing for Persistent AI Agentscited by 0
  4. 2026The Severance Problem: LLMs are Unaware of the Person Beyond the Promptcited by 0
  5. 2026HarnessRisk: A Lifecycle-Oriented Benchmark for Agent Harness Safetycited by 0
  6. 2026Value-Sensitive Delegation in Everyday AI Agent Use: Evidence from OpenClawcited by 0
  7. 2026Deny Without Disabling: Authorization-Paired Evaluation and Control for Multi-Agent Systemscited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026From Assistant to Double Agent: Formalizing and Benchmarking Attacks on OpenClaw for Personalized Local AI Agent
  2. 2026Uncovering Security Threats and Architecting Defenses in Autonomous Agents: A Case Study of OpenClaw
  3. 2026A Security Analysis of the OpenClaw AI Agent Framework
  4. 2026SafeClaw-R: Towards Safe and Secure Multi-Agent Personal Assistants
  5. 2026Security Attack and Defense Strategies for Autonomous Agent Frameworks: A Layered Review with OpenClaw as a Case Study
  6. 2026Clawed and Dangerous: Can We Trust Open Agentic Systems?
  7. 2026Taming OpenClaw: Security Analysis and Mitigation of Autonomous LLM Agent Threats
  8. 2026ClawSafety: "Safe" LLMs, Unsafe Agents