Verifiable Generation with Subsentence-Level Fine-Grained Citations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Verifiable generation requires large language models (LLMs) to cite source documents supporting their outputs, thereby improve output transparency and trustworthiness. Yet, previous work mainly targets the generation of sentence-level citations, lacking specificity about which parts of a sentence are backed by the cited sources. This work studies verifiable generation with subsentence-level fine-grained citations for more precise location of generated content supported by the cited sources. We first present a dataset, SCiFi, comprising 10K Wikipedia paragraphs with subsentence-level citations. Each paragraph is paired with a set of candidate source documents for citation and a query that triggers the generation of the paragraph content. On SCiFi, we evaluate the performance of state-of-the-art LLMs and strategies for processing long documents designed for these models. Our experiment results reveals key factors that could enhance the quality of citations, including the expansion of the source documents' context accessible to the models and the implementation of specialized model tuning.
Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2024.
Builds on
11 of 15 references.
References · 11
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,259
- 2023Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citationscited by 584
- 2023Evaluating Verifiability in Generative Search Enginescited by 297
- 2022Teaching language models to support answers with verified quotescited by 290
- 2021Measuring Attribution in Natural Language Generation Modelscited by 253
- 2022Revisiting the Gold Standard: Grounding Summarization Evaluation with Robust Human Evaluationcited by 141
- 2023WiCE: Real-World Entailment for Claims in Wikipediacited by 118
- 2023LLatrieval: LLM-Verified Retrieval for Verifiable Generationcited by 52
- 2024Source-Aware Training Enables Knowledge Attribution in Language Modelscited by 29
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 6; 2026: 8.
15 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2026From Lossy to Verified: A Provenance-Aware Tiered Memory for Agentscited by 16
- 2025Credible Plan-Driven RAG Method for Multi-Hop Question Answeringcited by 12
- 2025TROVE: A Challenge for Fine-Grained Text Provenance via Source Sentence Tracing and Relationship Classificationcited by 4
- 2026GenProve: Learning to Generate Text with Fine-Grained Provenancecited by 2
- 2026Are Finer Citations Always Better? Rethinking Granularity for Attributed Generationcited by 2
- 2024Rate, Explain and Cite (REC): Enhanced Explanation and Attribution in Automatic Evaluation by Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026RUBEN: Rule-Based Explanations for Retrieval-Augmented LLM Systemscited by 1
- 2026Legal LLM Hallucination Should Be Evaluated as Failure of Legal Warrantcited by 1
- 2025Issue Retrieval and Verification Enhanced Supplementary Code Comment Generationcited by 0
- 2025LCDS: A Logic-Controlled Discharge Summary Generation System Supporting Source Attribution and Expert Reviewcited by 0
- 2025Rule-Based Explanations for Retrieval-Augmented LLM Systemscited by 0
- 2025CC30k: A Citation Contexts Dataset for Reproducibility-Oriented Sentiment Analysiscited by 0
- 2026Legal LLM Hallucination Should Be Evaluated as Failure of Legal Warrant15 Jul 2026
- 2026Tokengeist: Multi-Turn Attribution Tracing in Agentic Conversations14 Jun 2026
- 2026Explicit Evidence Grounding via Structured Inline Citation Generation5 Jun 2026
- 2026Plans for Evaluating Structured Generative Search Summaries26 May 2026
- 2026RUBEN: Rule-Based Explanations for Retrieval-Augmented LLM Systems11 May 2026
- 2026Are Finer Citations Always Better? Rethinking Granularity for Attributed Generation1 Apr 2026
- 2026From Lossy to Verified: A Provenance-Aware Tiered Memory for Agents20 Feb 2026
- 2026GenProve: Learning to Generate Text with Fine-Grained Provenance8 Jan 2026
- 2025CC30k: A Citation Contexts Dataset for Reproducibility-Oriented Sentiment Analysis11 Nov 2025
- 2025Rule-Based Explanations for Retrieval-Augmented LLM Systems26 Oct 2025
- 2025LCDS: A Logic-Controlled Discharge Summary Generation System Supporting Source Attribution and Expert Review7 Jul 2025
- 2025Issue Retrieval and Verification Enhanced Supplementary Code Comment Generation17 Jun 2025
3 more
- 2025Credible Plan-Driven RAG Method for Multi-Hop Question Answering23 Apr 2025
- 2025TROVE: A Challenge for Fine-Grained Text Provenance via Source Sentence Tracing and Relationship Classification19 Mar 2025
- 2024Rate, Explain and Cite (REC): Enhanced Explanation and Attribution in Automatic Evaluation by Large Language Models3 Nov 2024
- 2025Credible Plan-Driven RAG Method for Multi-Hop Question Answeringcited by 12
- 2026RUBEN: Rule-Based Explanations for Retrieval-Augmented LLM Systemscited by 1
- 2025Issue Retrieval and Verification Enhanced Supplementary Code Comment Generationcited by 0
- 2025Rule-Based Explanations for Retrieval-Augmented LLM Systemscited by 0
- 2026RUBEN: Rule-Based Explanations for Retrieval-Augmented LLM Systems11 May 2026
- 2025Rule-Based Explanations for Retrieval-Augmented LLM Systems26 Oct 2025
- 2025Issue Retrieval and Verification Enhanced Supplementary Code Comment Generation17 Jun 2025
- 2025Credible Plan-Driven RAG Method for Multi-Hop Question Answering23 Apr 2025
- 2026From Lossy to Verified: A Provenance-Aware Tiered Memory for Agentscited by 16
- 2025TROVE: A Challenge for Fine-Grained Text Provenance via Source Sentence Tracing and Relationship Classificationcited by 4
- 2026GenProve: Learning to Generate Text with Fine-Grained Provenancecited by 2
- 2026Are Finer Citations Always Better? Rethinking Granularity for Attributed Generationcited by 2
- 2024Rate, Explain and Cite (REC): Enhanced Explanation and Attribution in Automatic Evaluation by Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026Legal LLM Hallucination Should Be Evaluated as Failure of Legal Warrantcited by 1
- 2025LCDS: A Logic-Controlled Discharge Summary Generation System Supporting Source Attribution and Expert Reviewcited by 0
- 2025CC30k: A Citation Contexts Dataset for Reproducibility-Oriented Sentiment Analysiscited by 0
- 2026Plans for Evaluating Structured Generative Search Summariescited by 0
- 2026Explicit Evidence Grounding via Structured Inline Citation Generationcited by 0
- 2026Legal LLM Hallucination Should Be Evaluated as Failure of Legal Warrant15 Jul 2026
- 2026Explicit Evidence Grounding via Structured Inline Citation Generation5 Jun 2026
- 2026Plans for Evaluating Structured Generative Search Summaries26 May 2026
- 2026Are Finer Citations Always Better? Rethinking Granularity for Attributed Generation1 Apr 2026
- 2026From Lossy to Verified: A Provenance-Aware Tiered Memory for Agents20 Feb 2026
- 2026GenProve: Learning to Generate Text with Fine-Grained Provenance8 Jan 2026
- 2025CC30k: A Citation Contexts Dataset for Reproducibility-Oriented Sentiment Analysis11 Nov 2025
- 2025LCDS: A Logic-Controlled Discharge Summary Generation System Supporting Source Attribution and Expert Review7 Jul 2025
- 2025TROVE: A Challenge for Fine-Grained Text Provenance via Source Sentence Tracing and Relationship Classification19 Mar 2025
- 2024Rate, Explain and Cite (REC): Enhanced Explanation and Attribution in Automatic Evaluation by Large Language Models3 Nov 2024