Concise and Sufficient Sub-Sentence Citations for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval
Abstract (arXiv)
In retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) question answering systems, generating citations for large language model (LLM) outputs enhances verifiability and helps users identify potential hallucinations. However, we observe two problems in the citations produced by existing attribution methods. First, the citations are typically provided at the sentence or even paragraph level. Long sentences or paragraphs may include a substantial amount of irrelevant content. Second, sentence-level citations may omit information that is essential for verifying the output, forcing users to read the surrounding context. In this paper, we propose generating sub-sentence citations that are both concise and sufficient, thereby reducing the effort required by users to confirm the correctness of the generated output. To this end, we first develop annotation guidelines for such citations and construct a corresponding dataset. Then, we propose an attribution framework for generating citations that adhere to our standards. This framework leverages LLMs to automatically generate fine-tuning data for our task and employs a credit model to filter out low-quality examples. Our experiments on the constructed dataset demonstrate that the propose approach can generate high-quality and more readable citations.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 14 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2025.
Builds on
14 of 22 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 13
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
- 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,282
- 2023Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citationscited by 595
- 2023Evaluating Verifiability in Generative Search Enginescited by 303
- 2020The elephant in the interpretability room: Why use attention as explanation when we have saliency methods?cited by 122
- 2019Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligencecited by 106
- 2024LongCite: Enabling LLMs to Generate Fine-grained Citations in Long-context QAcited by 81
- 2025LAQuer: Localized Attribution Queries in Content-grounded Generationcited by 13
1 more
- 2020Adversarial Attacks and Defense on Texts: A Surveycited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025VeriCite: Towards Reliable Citations in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Rigorous Verification
- 2026How Do LLMs Cite? A Mechanistic Interpretation of Attribution in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2024Ground Every Sentence: Improving Retrieval-Augmented LLMs with Interleaved Reference-Claim Generation
- 2024On the Capacity of Citation Generation by Large Language Models
- 2025CiteFix: Enhancing RAG Accuracy Through Post-Processing Citation Correction
- 2024Model Internals-based Answer Attribution for Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2024Citekit: A Modular Toolkit for Large Language Model Citation Generation
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Evolution, Current Landscape and Future Directions