mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Optimal Attack and Defense for Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2312.00198 ↗First posted 30 Nov 2023cs.LG cs.CR cs.GTcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To ensure the usefulness of Reinforcement Learning (RL) in real systems, it is crucial to ensure they are robust to noise and adversarial attacks. In adversarial RL, an external attacker has the power to manipulate the victim agent's interaction with the environment. We study the full class of online manipulation attacks, which include (i) state attacks, (ii) observation attacks (which are a generalization of perceived-state attacks), (iii) action attacks, and (iv) reward attacks. We show the attacker's problem of designing a stealthy attack that maximizes its own expected reward, which often corresponds to minimizing the victim's value, is captured by a Markov Decision Process (MDP) that we call a meta-MDP since it is not the true environment but a higher level environment induced by the attacked interaction. We show that the attacker can derive optimal attacks by planning in polynomial time or learning with polynomial sample complexity using standard RL techniques. We argue that the optimal defense policy for the victim can be computed as the solution to a stochastic Stackelberg game, which can be further simplified into a partially-observable turn-based stochastic game (POTBSG). Neither the attacker nor the victim would benefit from deviating from their respective optimal policies, thus such solutions are truly robust. Although the defense problem is NP-hard, we show that optimal Markovian defenses can be computed (learned) in polynomial time (sample complexity) in many scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2023.

Builds on

22 of 34 references.

References · 22

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  3. 2017Adversarial Attacks on Neural Network Policiescited by 320
  4. 2020Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning against Adversarial Perturbations on State Observationscited by 238
  5. 2019Action Robust Reinforcement Learning and Applications in Continuous Controlcited by 174
  6. 2017Tactics of Adversarial Attack on Deep Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 166
  7. 2021Robust Reinforcement Learning on State Observations with Learned Optimal Adversarycited by 135
  8. 2017Delving into adversarial attacks on deep policiescited by 104
  9. 2017Vulnerability of Deep Reinforcement Learning to Policy Induction Attackscited by 91
  10. 2020Adaptive Reward-Poisoning Attacks against Reinforcement Learningcited by 86
  11. 2020Stealthy and Efficient Adversarial Attacks against Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 63
  12. 2021Who Is the Strongest Enemy? Towards Optimal and Efficient Evasion Attacks in Deep RLcited by 55
10 more
  1. 2022The Complexity of Markov Equilibrium in Stochastic Gamescited by 49
  2. 2021CROP: Certifying Robust Policies for Reinforcement Learning through Functional Smoothingcited by 42
  3. 2021Provably Efficient Black-Box Action Poisoning Attacks Against Reinforcement Learningcited by 29
  4. 2021Defense Against Reward Poisoning Attacks in Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
  5. 2022Understanding the Limits of Poisoning Attacks in Episodic Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
  6. 2018Sequential Attacks on Agents for Long-Term Adversarial Goalscited by 16
  7. 2020Query-based Targeted Action-Space Adversarial Policies on Deep Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 15
  8. 2020Minimax Sample Complexity for Turn-based Stochastic Gamecited by 13
  9. 2017On Stackelberg Mixed Strategiescited by 10
  10. 2021The Stackelberg Equilibrium for One-sided Zero-sum Partially Observable Stochastic Gamescited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 1; 2026: 5.

12 papers.