RESTRAIN: Reinforcement Learning-Based Secure Framework for Trigger-Action IoT Environment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Internet of Things (IoT) platforms with trigger-action capability allow event conditions to trigger actions in IoT devices autonomously by creating a chain of interactions. Adversaries exploit this chain of interactions to maliciously inject fake event conditions into IoT hubs, triggering unauthorized actions on target IoT devices to implement remote injection attacks. Existing defense mechanisms focus mainly on the verification of event transactions using physical event fingerprints to enforce the security policies to block unsafe event transactions. These approaches are designed to provide offline defense against injection attacks. The state-of-the-art online defense mechanisms offer real-time defense, but extensive reliability on the inference of attack impacts on the IoT network limits the generalization capability of these approaches. In this paper, we propose a platform-independent multi-agent online defense system, namely RESTRAIN, to counter remote injection attacks at runtime. RESTRAIN allows the defense agent to profile attack actions at runtime and leverages reinforcement learning to optimize a defense policy that complies with the security requirements of the IoT network. The experimental results show that the defense agent effectively takes real-time defense actions against complex and dynamic remote injection attacks and maximizes the security gain with minimal computational overhead.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2025.
Builds on
12 of 25 references.
References · 12
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,736
- 2016TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systemscited by 664
- 2015Deep Recurrent Q-Learning for Partially Observable MDPscited by 465
- 2018IoTSan: Fortifying the Safety of IoT Systemscited by 3
- 2020D-ACC: Dynamic Adaptive Cruise Control for Highways with Ramps Based on Deep Q-Learningcited by 2
- 2022RLPG: Reinforcement Learning Approach for Dynamic Intra-Platoon Gap Adaptation for Highway On-Ramp Mergingcited by 2
- 2018Program Analysis of Commodity IoT Applications for Security and Privacy: Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 1
- 2021A Comprehensive Survey on the State-of-the-art Data Provenance Approaches for Security Enforcementcited by 1
- 2022IoTMonitor: A Hidden Markov Model-based Security System to Identify Crucial Attack Nodes in Trigger-action IoT Platformscited by 1
- 2024IoTWarden: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Real-time Defense System to Mitigate Trigger-action IoT Attackscited by 1
- 2024Ruledger: Ensuring Execution Integrity in Trigger-Action IoT Platformscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025L2M-AID: Autonomous Cyber-Physical Defense by Fusing Semantic Reasoning of Large Language Models with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (Preprint)
- 2026Self-Adaptive Multi-Agent LLM-Based Security Pattern Selection for IoT Systems
- 2026Unlearning to Protect: A Distilled Reinforcement Learning Framework with Privacy-Preserving Feature Unlearning and XAI for IoT Security
- 2026An AI-Based Solution for Secure Service Provisioning in IoT
- 2026Multi-Agent LLM Governance for Safe Two-Timescale Reinforcement Learning in SDN-IoT Defense
- 2025Nash Equilibrium Between Consumer Electronic Devices and DoS Attacker for Distributed IoT-enabled RSE Systems
- 2026PISmith: Reinforcement Learning-based Red Teaming for Prompt Injection Defenses
- 2026DeFRiS: Silo-Cooperative IoT Applications Scheduling via Decentralized Federated Reinforcement Learning