mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

GISTBench: Evaluating LLM User Understanding via Evidence-Based Interest Verification

arXiv 2603.29112 ↗First posted 31 Mar 2026cs.AI cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce GISTBench, a benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models' (LLMs) ability to understand users from their interaction histories in recommendation systems. Unlike traditional RecSys benchmarks that focus on item prediction accuracy, our benchmark evaluates how well LLMs can extract and verify user interests from engagement data. We propose two novel metric families: Interest Groundedness (IG), decomposed into precision and recall components to separately penalize hallucinated interest categories and reward coverage, and Interest Specificity (IS), which assesses the distinctiveness of verified LLM-predicted user profiles. We release a synthetic dataset constructed on real user interactions on a global short-form video platform. Our dataset contains both implicit and explicit engagement signals and rich textual descriptions. We validate our dataset fidelity against user surveys, and evaluate eight open-weight LLMs spanning 7B to 235B parameters, together with three proprietary frontier models (GPT-5, Claude 4.6, and Gemini 3.5 Flash). Our findings reveal performance bottlenecks in current LLMs, particularly their limited ability to accurately count and attribute engagement signals across heterogeneous interaction types.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2026.

Builds on

23 of 34 references.

References · 23

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  4. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
  5. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,076
  6. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,258
  7. 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,151
  8. 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 590
  9. 2024Scaling Synthetic Data Creation with 1,000,000,000 Personascited by 397
  10. 2023LLMRec: Large Language Models with Graph Augmentation for Recommendationcited by 171
  11. 2024TableBench: A Comprehensive and Complex Benchmark for Table Question Answeringcited by 127
  12. 2024Faithfulness vs. Plausibility: On the (Un)Reliability of Explanations from Large Language Modelscited by 104
11 more
  1. 2024Personalization of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 100
  2. 2022KuaiRec: A Fully-observed Dataset and Insights for Evaluating Recommender Systemscited by 94
  3. 2023Rethinking the Evaluation for Conversational Recommendation in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 48
  4. 2024Transparent and Scrutable Recommendations Using Natural Language User Profilescited by 24
  5. 2025iAgent: LLM Agent as a Shield between User and Recommender Systemscited by 23
  6. 2025Towards Next-Generation Recommender Systems: A Benchmark for Personalized Recommendation Assistant with LLMscited by 20
  7. 2024Large Language Models as Evaluators for Recommendation Explanationscited by 19
  8. 2024End-to-end Training for Recommendation with Language-based User Profilescited by 10
  9. 2024Intrinsic User-Centric Interpretability through Global Mixture of Expertscited by 9
  10. 2026ALPBench: A Benchmark for Attribution-level Long-term Personal Behavior Understandingcited by 2
  11. 2024RecSys Arena: Pair-wise Recommender System Evaluation with Large Language Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.