mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Intrinsic User-Centric Interpretability through Global Mixture of Experts

arXiv 2402.02933 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2024cs.LG cs.CY cs.HCcited by 9

On the map: Mixture-of-experts → MoE theory and gating functions

Abstract (arXiv)

In human-centric settings like education or healthcare, model accuracy and model explainability are key factors for user adoption. Towards these two goals, intrinsically interpretable deep learning models have gained popularity, focusing on accurate predictions alongside faithful explanations. However, there exists a gap in the human-centeredness of these approaches, which often produce nuanced and complex explanations that are not easily actionable for downstream users. We present InterpretCC (interpretable conditional computation), a family of intrinsically interpretable neural networks at a unique point in the design space that optimizes for ease of human understanding and explanation faithfulness, while maintaining comparable performance to state-of-the-art models. InterpretCC achieves this through adaptive sparse activation of features before prediction, allowing the model to use a different, minimal set of features for each instance. We extend this idea into an interpretable, global mixture-of-experts (MoE) model that allows users to specify topics of interest, discretely separates the feature space for each data point into topical subnetworks, and adaptively and sparsely activates these topical subnetworks for prediction. We apply InterpretCC for text, time series and tabular data across several real-world datasets, demonstrating comparable performance with non-interpretable baselines and outperforming intrinsically interpretable baselines. Through a user study involving 56 teachers, InterpretCC explanations are found to have higher actionability and usefulness over other intrinsically interpretable approaches.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MoE theory and gating functions, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 60 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2024.

Builds on

60 of 89 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Interpretable Mixture of Experts5 Jun
  2. 2021DSelect-k: Differentiable Selection in the Mixture of Experts with Applications to Multi-Task Learning7 Jun

Other references · 58

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  3. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  5. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  6. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  7. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  8. 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,014
  9. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
  10. 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,708
  11. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  12. 2013Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computationcited by 2,031
38 more
  1. 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,785
  2. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  3. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
  4. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
  5. 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 731
  6. 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
  7. 2020Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Netscited by 318
  8. 2021BASE Layers: Simplifying Training of Large, Sparse Modelscited by 315
  9. 2018Explanations based on the Missing: Towards Contrastive Explanations with Pertinent Negativescited by 261
  10. 2019InterpretML: A Unified Framework for Machine Learning Interpretabilitycited by 243
  11. 2018Techniques for Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 237
  12. 2022Multimodal Contrastive Learning with LIMoE: the Language-Image Mixture of Expertscited by 202
  13. 2022Branch-Train-Merge: Embarrassingly Parallel Training of Expert Language Modelscited by 187
  14. 2015Conditional Computation in Neural Networks for faster modelscited by 166
  15. 2022The Disagreement Problem in Explainable Machine Learning: A Practitioner's Perspectivecited by 156
  16. 2022A Review of Sparse Expert Models in Deep Learningcited by 147
  17. 2022Towards Faithful Model Explanation in NLP: A Surveycited by 129
  18. 2019Interpretable Neural Predictions with Differentiable Binary Variablescited by 126
  19. 2021Explainable AI (XAI): A Systematic Meta-Survey of Current Challenges and Future Opportunitiescited by 125
  20. 2022OpenXAI: Towards a Transparent Evaluation of Model Explanationscited by 125
  21. 2021Deformable ProtoPNet: An Interpretable Image Classifier Using Deformable Prototypescited by 120
  22. 2020Learning to Faithfully Rationalize by Constructioncited by 113
  23. 2021Graph-Guided Network for Irregularly Sampled Multivariate Time Seriescited by 110
  24. 2019Rethinking Cooperative Rationalization: Introspective Extraction and Complement Controlcited by 96
  25. 2019Dynamic Convolutions: Exploiting Spatial Sparsity for Faster Inferencecited by 91
  26. 2021A Comprehensive Taxonomy for Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Survey of Surveys on Methods and Conceptscited by 90
  27. 2022B-cos Networks: Alignment is All We Need for Interpretabilitycited by 88
  28. 2020Aligning Faithful Interpretations with their Social Attributioncited by 79
  29. 2022Concept Bottleneck Model with Additional Unsupervised Conceptscited by 79
  30. 2021Synthetic Benchmarks for Scientific Research in Explainable Machine Learningcited by 59
  31. 2022Framework for Evaluating Faithfulness of Local Explanationscited by 55
  32. 2022Scalable Spatiotemporal Graph Neural Networkscited by 52
  33. 2013Low-Rank Approximations for Conditional Feedforward Computation in Deep Neural Networkscited by 44
  34. 2023Unlocking Feature Visualization for Deeper Networks with MAgnitude Constrained Optimizationcited by 26
  35. 2018AI in Education needs interpretable machine learning: Lessons from Open Learner Modellingcited by 18
  36. 2023SpArX: Sparse Argumentative Explanations for Neural Networks [Technical Report]cited by 18
  37. 2022Evaluating the Explainers: Black-Box Explainable Machine Learning for Student Success Prediction in MOOCscited by 17
  38. 2021The Irrationality of Neural Rationale Modelscited by 16

50 most cited of 58 All 58 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Mixture of Experts Made Intrinsically Interpretable
  2. 2026Scaling Inherently Interpretable Language Models
  3. 2024Rethinking Interpretability in the Era of Large Language Models
  4. 2020Making Neural Networks Interpretable with Attribution: Application to Implicit Signals Prediction
  5. 2023FIND: A Function Description Benchmark for Evaluating Interpretability Methods
  6. 2022Interpretable by Design: Learning Predictors by Composing Interpretable Queries
  7. 2025Human-aligned Deep Learning: Explainability, Causality, and Biological Inspiration
  8. 2025A Human-Centric Approach to Explainable AI for Personalized Education